EEVblog Electronics Community Forum

General => General Technical Chat => Topic started by: apis on June 15, 2018, 01:24:05 pm

Title: Siemens eFusion electric aircraft crash
Post by: apis on June 15, 2018, 01:24:05 pm
Quote
Witnesses reported seeing the aircraft maneuvering at low altitude before catching fire and crashing in a near vertical dive. The impact in a corn field approximately a mile from the Pecs-Pogany Airport (LHPP) caused a fire.
Source: https://fightersweep.com/10417/two-die-in-crash-of-siemens-powered-efusion-electric-airplane/

Bad battery?
Title: Re: Siemens eFusion electric aircraft crash
Post by: In Vacuo Veritas on June 15, 2018, 03:42:35 pm
Seems silly not to have one of these
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_Recovery_Systems

especially on a prototype.
Title: Re: Siemens eFusion electric aircraft crash
Post by: Howardlong on June 15, 2018, 06:41:24 pm
Seems silly not to have one of these
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_Recovery_Systems

especially on a prototype.

Here’s a lot of argument about these, and whether or not they’re the “right” thing to do, because you can’t control an aircraft that’s on the end of a parachute, and who it ends up landing on. You can control a gliding aircraft though, and avoid crashing into someone’s conservatory. In the case of a fire on board though, all bets are off.
Title: Re: Siemens eFusion electric aircraft crash
Post by: janoc on June 15, 2018, 09:02:15 pm
Seems silly not to have one of these
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_Recovery_Systems

especially on a prototype.

Those ballistic chutes have to be certified for the plane, you can't just go, buy one and put it on a random ultralight/GA plane. In addition, the parachute needs certain minimum altitude to work - if they were too low, it wouldn't have helped them anyway.