Sure, just follow the textbook provided recipie without any intuitive understanding of what the transform is or does. It gets the job done. Sometimes.
The point of those videos is not to provide straight forward practical solving algo for subset of problems, but rather aid to gain intuitive undestanding of the operating principle, which is IMHO way more usefull if it locks into your knolwedge framework. Once you have this intuitive overview of what it is and does, you can easily handle the formal notation and accept the implications it has. Note I am not saying it should fit into such framework without validation of correctness and hunting for corner cases on which it falls apart. But it is still orders of magnitude more usefull initial point than reading dry and even dryer formal proof, or listening to egoistic estrade by mostly clueless proffesor which above all enjoys his pureness of formal expression, nothing else allowed. (Yes, I know good math teachers do exist, but they are super rare).
I have met plenty of A+ students passing each exam first try with ease, and it was very entertaining to see how they were failing to apply their supposed knowledge about the topics on similar, but not exactly matching problems to those they prepared for during the mesmorisation. Photographic memory and wee bit of logical thinking can get you very far here.
I recommend reading A Mathematician’s Lament by Paul Lockhart - the issue he conveys covers the entire span of our educational system from elementary to universities.