General > General Technical Chat

Solar Freaking bike parking

<< < (12/14) > >>

RJSV:
   This thread is evolving to more fully show, the Pro-Dirt-Level 'consultrant' offering randomly incomplete, quickly dispensed, but not well thought out points.
   Grabbing new ideas, in a reactionary defensive shift, as criticism negates earlier postures.   Like I've been saying, a non-biased observer or investigator would make some notes, saying the person posting (responses) makes new claims, that don't appear earlier.
Example:
   After a bulk of critics start proving that financial viability isn't there, the argument shifts.   So now it's "New tech needs time".   Wow, now You've agreed with your critics that currently no financial viability.   That's reminiscent of an army, retreating, overrun.
'Low volume is because it's still in infancy'.
Shoulda said that, up front, before your hand was forced.

   Reading the initial dialogue, I had been assuming you know the basic configuration.   You don't, you don't even know / state if there is inverter and battery included.   If grid tie or no grid tie (meanwhile speculating that the lack of grid-tie is, somehow GREENER, even, than 'normal' green, that, by the way, is yet to materialize to any degree of percentage.

With all the 'lalala....I don't hear youuu...' you neglected to answer the most simple question, so I'll help out, and repeat it:
   Are you an agent or representative, charged with internet PR, and paid for such ?

   You maintain the posture that,
   "You guys keep pushing your wish for a ROOF mounted system, only."
And;   "You guys keep pushing for not using any solar power."

   Self-contradictory, and really just sloppy arguments.   (They should refuse to pay you, for this sloppy job lobbying).

    Too little hard info, with a ton of wiggle words:
   'likely'
   'maybe'
   'i looked at picture, so...'
   'maybe more (charge current), don't know'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But then very definite:
   "Quite sure...judging from picture..."
   "I don't see ..any intense traffic in picture"

   And, I LOVE this one:   (thanks)
   "If XYZ is so good;  it would have been there already."

PlainName:
Anyone thought of asking them why they didn't  build a bike shed instead? Then we'd know rather than make up stuff.

Nominal Animal:

--- Quote from: PlainName on March 06, 2024, 09:03:06 pm ---Anyone thought of asking them why they didn't  build a bike shed instead? Then we'd know rather than make up stuff.

--- End quote ---
Only cars (in the background) get the privilege of a covered parking area. ::)

Actually, the charging station is front of some kind of kiosk-like structure already.  A bit of overhang is visible in the full-sized image; open it in a new browser window.
So, there seems to be a roof basically right there, but who knows if it is used for solar panels or not.

(Wouldn't it be funny if it had ordinary panels horizontal on a flat roof, "supplementing" the output from the pavement tiles?)

PlainName:
Got to say that the panels and stand look like they could be taken away in half a day leaving little trace, and put somewhere else in half a day without any prep. That stand in the background, OTOH, would want planning permission and ain't going anywhere soon. Seems a quick and cheap (and no doubt temporary) way to set something up.

But, again, the one's that actually know ain't in this thread :)

RJSV:
   (Sorry, if things got a little heated, in discussions here, it's all good).
   
   In fairness, to the debate on energy supply in(solar), costs, and general practical outcomes, another part of the equation is going to be, increasingly, including 'costs' generally, for NOT DOING the green agenda items, using the obvious increase in storms and 'strange' novel weather patterns.
But still;  that expanded argument can be tailored and twisted, into the whole 'Woke' madness, that afflicts many.  (Heck, much of the 'faulty' science things aren't proposed with any eye to addressing critics...besides name calling).
   So, in my view much of the initial arguments, in this thread, should have included a practical 'benefit' analysis.   So round and round, and round and round we go, as weather changes have some increased menace.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod