Greetings EEVBees:
--Please see the link below for a NY Times article on PV Solar and Net Metering. To my mind it is a balanced article, allowing advocates for both sides to give their views. No, doubt some will call the article biased, and the NY Times a shill, because it dared to allow other than pro net metering voices.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/05/business/solar-payments-set-off-a-fairness-debate.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all&--My question, however technical rather than political, see the below quote:
"The federal Department of Energy envisions a future in which a typical homeowner might feed power into the system from solar panels, small wind turbines or electric vehicles sitting idle in the garage, offsetting charges for power used at a later time and helping provide energy to the system during periods of high demand."
--Now, I confess that Amory Lovins, and Mike Simpson of the Rocky Mountain Institute have mentioned something like this, see link and quote below.
http://livinggreenmag.com/2012/01/23/green-business/amory-lovins-leads-oregon-workshop-on-smart-garage-concept/"An integrated system that allows vehicles to feed their battery charge back into the grid can bring stability to the grid during blackouts and peak demand. According to RMI’s Mike Simpson. “By some estimates, a battery electric vehicle, with about 40 kilowatt-hours of usable energy, could power an entire residential block for more than an hour if necessary.”
--Would this sort of thing ever be practical, given that you would have to forego driving the vehicle while it is powering the grid, and while it is recharging for the second time. Include reduced battery life for driving purposes, additional, equipment costs, and inverter and charging loses, both ways. So you would pay for downloading a kilowatt which by the time you re-uploaded it would have shrunk do to losses.
--My question, at last, is; Does the above DOE statement make any sense with regard to EVs.
"A theory is the more impressive the greater the simplicity of its premises, the more different kinds of things it relates, and the more extended its area of applicability. Therefore the deep impression that classical thermodynamics made upon me. It is the only physical theory of universal content which I am convinced will never be overthrown, within the framework of applicability of its basic concepts. "
Albert Einstein 1879 1955
Best Regards
Clear Ether