Well, right out of the box this guy claims twice the distance with the same power, or the same size, implied the same distance, with half the power. Huh? First part means nothing as who knows what the change in antenna physical design and size would be. The second part implies that the new antenna material is 4x more efficient than the old material...... just by changing the material.....
He then makes some crazy statement that the new material will transmit from the depths of the oceans into outer space without effort. Waffly bs if I ever heard it.
Then he claims "an order of magnitude better" against some unknown geometry with their painted dipole of tree bark. Well if the original standard antenna was a 1/16 wave base loaded stub antenna for a walkie talkie then yes very possible. So what?
A cop car antenna gets hot enough to burn you and stays that way even a few seconds after the transmission stops? What are they using in cop cars? 1000W pumping into antenna that has enough thermal inertia to stay hot for seconds after and is so inefficient that it heats up that quickly too? Transmit for a minute and you would have a nice bright melting antenna.
A material that is sprayed on and spreads out in just the right pattern... regardless of the surface being painted.... I guess he means random.
"a capacitor is very efficient if energy is flowing through it very quickly" Its a good thing that he didn't use any slow energy then.
They transmitted to an airplane 14 miles overhead. Or, in feet, around 72,000 feet. It is good they could afford to have an ER-2 (U2) flying around overhead to do this test.
The next one is even more ridiculous. An RF ID tag with nothing but their paint laid over the antenna that existed transmitted around 20,000 times more power!
Next, an iPhone! Wow, they gained a whole 100mW (20dBm). What is the output of the iPhone? If I understand things correctly a cell phone has a maximum output of 500mW.
The underwater test is meaningless. First of all the US does not use 50MHz to communicate under water so any antenna that he claimed was being used by the military was not for use underwater. The military uses ELF waves in the single digit Hertz. Their testing was flawed from that just that point alone, or claimed test.
And the best one of all, he throws in the "free energy out of thin air" card and improved efficiency for anything that uses electricity.
wesolveforx is quite the website