General > General Technical Chat
Starship 12.5km launch
<< < (9/13) > >>
Mr. Scram:

--- Quote from: S. Petrukhin on December 12, 2020, 06:01:17 pm ---I try to write in detail, but you don't read or I don't explain well... I will write briefly.

I wish success to all who work in space and to all engineers in general.
While Russian space is still needed. But there are concerns.
I don't see complex tasks solved in SpaceX, normal work, repetition of the past, but a lot of shows.

By the way, if I had my own rocket, I would be the first to fly into space.  :)

--- End quote ---
You seem to reduce and simplify to the point of all detail being lost, to then claim two detailless things are the same. You've been explained in some detail why and how things are different and you choose to just repeat earlier statements, ignoring any input. People aren't going to go into more detail when even broad basics are ignored. Folks here seem to be making some effort to explain things and ignoring any and all of it is honestly a bit rude.

Tl;dr when you put your fingers in your ears, all arguments sound the same.
S. Petrukhin:
All I can do is congratulate the Americans on returning to their launch vehicles. I don't know why NASA hasn't done this for years.
And I wish to myself that our launch vehicles were also good and useful.

Guys, this is not a scientific forum on cosmonautics, I don't understand why I - a simple spectator of cosmonautics-have such complaints. I express my humble opinion, write some arguments, you don't read them, write your arguments.

Why are you so aggressive? What do you have to do with these successes? Why do you so zealously defend the sacredness of the event?
I'm tired of this unfriendly communication.
wraper:

--- Quote from: S. Petrukhin on December 12, 2020, 07:04:05 pm ---Why are you so aggressive? What do you have to do with these successes? Why do you so zealously defend the sacredness of the event?
I'm tired of this unfriendly communication.

--- End quote ---
Because you mostly wrote arguments which are completely false. And diminish landing of what will be a truly reusable spacecraft with 100 tonne carrying capacity to anywhere in the Solar system, as if it was some reiteration of old technology. Also it's powered by rocket engines made by themselves. About engine, nobody ever before made any of this: 1. full-flow staged combustion engine which actually worked and left Earth surface, 2. operates on methane, 3. >300 atmosphere chamber pressure.
Mr. Scram:

--- Quote from: S. Petrukhin on December 12, 2020, 07:04:05 pm ---All I can do is congratulate the Americans on returning to their launch vehicles. I don't know why NASA hasn't done this for years.
And I wish to myself that our launch vehicles were also good and useful.

Guys, this is not a scientific forum on cosmonautics, I don't understand why I - a simple spectator of cosmonautics-have such complaints. I express my humble opinion, write some arguments, you don't read them, write your arguments.

Why are you so aggressive? What do you have to do with these successes? Why do you so zealously defend the sacredness of the event?
I'm tired of this unfriendly communication.

--- End quote ---
Who is being aggressive? People are trying to be helpful, but are unfortunately ignored. People not only read and understand your comments, but also explain why your comments may represent an overly simplistic view. People are only disappointed that you don't seem to want to read, understand or address any of the points that were made. That's got nothing to do with any event, but simply with disappointment regarding behaviour and common courtesy.
olkipukki:

--- Quote from: S. Petrukhin on December 12, 2020, 11:03:53 am ---But there were no people in the USSR who profited from space.

--- End quote ---

 :-DD

Is it came from the same proverb list that famous "There is no sex in the USSR"?  ::)

Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod