Author Topic: Stock Electronic Image FAILS  (Read 227458 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online vk6zgo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7585
  • Country: au
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #875 on: March 18, 2023, 02:32:09 am »
Quote
I've never found a use for such a poorly parameterised transistor tester.

I always thought they were a go/no go check that the transistor works (or not) rather than determining characteristics of it.

They don't really work as go/no-go though because if there's a CE short (at least on the meters I have used) it will show as having a very high gain, 500+, which is in the 'plausible' range for some types of devices.  And CE short is probably one of the more common failure modes for BJTs.

If it pulsed the base it could determine whether the transistor had any shorted junctions, but it doesn't do that. So the utility is very limited IMO -- at best it's a "toy" feature to learn a bit about transistors.

Who really needs a dedicated transistor test socket on a multimeter?

They were a gimmick on the last few generations of analog meters, & remain a gimmick on DMMs.
It is easy enough to test transistors to determine the correct pin configuration & to do "go or no go" tests with the DMM on
"diode test", & using the test leads.

(1) Find the base by testing between the pins until you find a pin that tests as a diode to both of the other pins.
You now also know there are no shorted or open circuit junctions, & whether the device is NPN or PNP.

(2) For simplicity let's assume it is NPN.
Now, placing the +ve & -ve DMM leads on the two unknown pins, moisten your finger & place it between the "+ve" pin & the base.
As BJTs do to some extent work "backwards" even if the +ve pin is the emitter, the DMM will show a reading---record this.
Reverse the +ve & -ve connections & again moisten your finger & place it between base & the "+ve pin".

If this is a higher reading, that pin is the collector, if lower, it is the emitter.
(All polarities should be reversed for PNP).

Of course, such a test is not very repeatable, as a calibrated "spitty finger" is a bit hard to come by, so you can mount a bunch of sockets of various types & have a resistor of several k \$\Omega\$ connected between various configurations of base & collector via a pushbutton switch.

I always found it easier to tack something together "on the day" or just go with the "spitty finger", although I do have one properly made up for TO3 packages from when I had to match some devices in that package.

I know this is a bit elementary, but I thought giving "chapter & verse" would make things clearer for any "noobs" who may be reading it.
 

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16642
  • Country: 00
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #876 on: March 18, 2023, 02:47:27 am »
They don't really work as go/no-go though because if there's a CE short (at least on the meters I have used) it will show as having a very high gain, 500+, which is in the 'plausible' range for some types of devices.  And CE short is probably one of the more common failure modes for BJTs.

I think you're supposed to test them with the diode tester before you go to hFe.

But yeah, those things were designed long before very high gain transistors. A gain of 500 is beyond them.
 

Online vk6zgo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7585
  • Country: au
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #877 on: March 18, 2023, 03:47:48 am »
More AC battery testing LOL -

Actually, that's the correct reading for a cheap DMM with half-wave rectified AC ranges. I just checked on one. It's a case of wrong switch position selected rather than false display.  ;)

I tried it and mine jumped around all over the place.

Odd, it worked on my little Skytronic... https://www.eevblog.com/forum/chat/what-did-you-buy-today-post-your-latest-purchase!/msg4160605/#msg4160605  On a reasonably fresh Alkaline AA I got 2.5V reading (one polarity).

I asked the Fluke77 what it thought----it gave a fleeting reading of around 0.170 to 0.2 volts, depending upon which way round I connected the battery.

I dragged out my little "El Cheapo" Digitech clamp meter & tried the same test on its DMM function, & it agreed with the 77.

The 77 can be confused on DC range by unipolar pulsed signals.

I found this out when I was looking at a DC supply derived of an overwind on my Mother in Law's TV Set EHT transformer.
The filter cap had died, but the Fluke read "a bit low" on DC, & only when I looked at it with a 'scope did it become obvious.

Somewhere I have a very cheap analog multimeter I got with a bunch of resistors & stuff 30 plus years ago---it would be interesting to see what it will do with this "battery" test.
 

Offline PlainName

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6821
  • Country: va
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #878 on: March 18, 2023, 09:43:42 am »
Shouldn't even the cheapest meters be blocking DC on the AC range?
 

Offline mendip_discovery

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 844
  • Country: gb
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #879 on: March 18, 2023, 02:23:14 pm »
For those wondering how/why these gopping pictures ever come out.

Well... its a bit like asking an EE to photograph some equipment in use. You end up with a technically correct picture but its messy, disorganised and not much use for stock imagery. How many times have you looked at a Ham Radio club website/magazine and cringed at the photograph they use to show off the kit.

If you are in the stock image market you are trying to get generic and non-brand-specific photos while also doing this on a budget as you might not earn any money from the photo for a while if ever and even if it does get used it might only be a few $£. I have tried to submit photos and got a list back of things that were not much use.

Then you have the sales team and photographer trying to get photos. Think of what level of knowledge a social media influencer has on a subject and put it with a person being paid to get some good looking photos and has even less knowedge of the subject.

I always wince when I look at other cal lab websites as its always the same images, the lab likes to show they have stuff but don't want to give away too much of the kit they have so the competition can get a look in. Look they have the NCC 1701-B, OMG they are soo old skool.

Though my mind boggles with the photos I see on sites where cheap Chinese products are sold. Objects photoshopped into another image but making a mess of scale so you can't actually see the size of it. I see on Kickstarter lots of videos promoting a product using western actors and giving the whole made in the USA vibe but then you look at it and just a Chinese outfit selling some shonky product.
Motorcyclist, Nerd, and I work in a Calibration Lab :-)
--
So everyone is clear, Calibration = Taking Measurement against a known source, Verification = Checking Calibration against Specification, Adjustment = Adjusting the unit to be within specifications.
 

Offline Gyro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9485
  • Country: gb
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #880 on: March 18, 2023, 03:32:27 pm »
Shouldn't even the cheapest meters be blocking DC on the AC range?

Should or desirable?  That would require the addition of a reasonably sized series capacitor and at least full wave rectification. You could argue (in fact the manufacturer clearly has!) that sticking in a simple series diode and adjusting the scale factor is good enough for a (sub) cheapie with a 200V lowest AC range.
Best Regards, Chris
 

Offline PlainName

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6821
  • Country: va
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #881 on: March 18, 2023, 04:08:22 pm »
Should. It's wrong to give an AC value to a DC signal, although I suppose it could be argued that DC is merely AC with a very long period (but it would have to be really so long it would effectively be DC anyway).
 

Online xrunner

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7513
  • Country: us
  • hp>Agilent>Keysight>???
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #882 on: March 18, 2023, 04:11:54 pm »
My advice would be to lose the tranny tester and fix the DC measurement - costs should cancel out.  :-DD
I told my friends I could teach them to be funny, but they all just laughed at me.
 

Offline TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7942
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #883 on: March 18, 2023, 04:21:02 pm »
Shouldn't even the cheapest meters be blocking DC on the AC range?

The old-school Simpson 260 analog VOMs had separate modes for "AC" and "Output", where the latter was DC-blocked with a series capacitor.
 
The following users thanked this post: newbrain

Offline RoGeorge

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6186
  • Country: ro
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #884 on: March 26, 2023, 06:45:53 pm »

Online xrunner

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7513
  • Country: us
  • hp>Agilent>Keysight>???
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #885 on: March 26, 2023, 06:53:24 pm »
The other side is broken?  :P
I told my friends I could teach them to be funny, but they all just laughed at me.
 

Offline magic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6761
  • Country: pl
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #886 on: March 26, 2023, 08:19:49 pm »
Looks like he is soldering SMD push buttons on a webcam, good for him.
Where is the fail? :P

edit
Maybe not a webcam, not sure what it is.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2023, 08:23:02 pm by magic »
 

Online floobydust

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6960
  • Country: ca
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #887 on: March 26, 2023, 08:27:33 pm »
roasted thumbnail? Well that and he's gonna fail heating up one side of a two pin switch, that does not remove it. Nope. Tried it.
 

Offline magic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6761
  • Country: pl
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #888 on: March 26, 2023, 08:35:13 pm »
Actually, weird things can be desoldered with one iron and some patience and creativity.
In this case, you could nudge each side alternately until both are shifted off their pads.
 

Offline Zoli

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 498
  • Country: ca
  • Grumpy old men
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #889 on: March 26, 2023, 09:13:56 pm »

Nail and skin touches iron - very fast reaction; don't ask me how I know.
 

Offline AndyBeez

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 856
  • Country: nu
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #890 on: April 02, 2023, 11:26:22 am »
Not sure why this is a thing considered suitable for human use, but we use an identical 'tub-n-spa' to jet wash engine casings and fan shrouds. Which probably explains why the bosses wife is not impressed with our male obsession for gleaming car parts - because she normally uses it to jet wash her dog. Maybe you could use one of these 'porta-pools' to ultrasound oversized printed circuit boards? Anyway, it's a thing (Hot/cold girl and cold/hot soapy water not included).
:popcorn:
 

Offline helius

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3639
  • Country: us
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #891 on: April 03, 2023, 04:30:26 am »
Nothing screams "boutique bathtub" like a giant warning label.

On the other hand, a product I have has a quite reasonable warning:
CHOKING HAZARD. Small children who tamper with delicate parts will be forcibly choked.
 
The following users thanked this post: vk6zgo, AndyBeez

Offline PlainName

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6821
  • Country: va
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #892 on: April 03, 2023, 06:34:39 am »
That warning label looks fake to me: different perspective to the tub. Struggling to think why they'd stick a fake label on there, though!
 
The following users thanked this post: AndyBeez

Offline McBryce

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2682
  • Country: de
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #893 on: April 08, 2023, 06:31:57 pm »
If the wife ever gets amputated from the waist down, at least I'll know where to get a suitable tub for her.

McBryce.
30 Years making cars more difficult to repair.
 
The following users thanked this post: VK3DRB, helius, AndyBeez

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16642
  • Country: 00
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #894 on: April 09, 2023, 06:37:54 am »
If the wife ever gets amputated from the waist down, at least I'll know where to get a suitable tub for her.

Legs are sold separately.

That warning label looks fake to me: different perspective to the tub. Struggling to think why they'd stick a fake label on there, though!

Nah, there's dozens and dozens of pictures of these things out there. Hardly any of them look photoshopped.

« Last Edit: April 09, 2023, 06:39:29 am by Fungus »
 
The following users thanked this post: AndyBeez

Offline PlainName

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6821
  • Country: va
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #895 on: April 09, 2023, 10:14:41 am »
That one does too. The warning label is square on (that is, the horizontals are dead horizontal and the verticals dead vertical) but the surface it is supposed to be on is curved and tilted away slightly. And we're looking at it from just above.
 
The following users thanked this post: AndyBeez

Offline Nominal Animal

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6242
  • Country: fi
    • My home page and email address
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #896 on: April 09, 2023, 10:18:23 am »
Not sure why this is a thing considered suitable for human use, but we use an identical 'tub-n-spa' to jet wash engine casings and fan shrouds. Which probably explains why the bosses wife is not impressed with our male obsession for gleaming car parts - because she normally uses it to jet wash her dog. Maybe you could use one of these 'porta-pools' to ultrasound oversized printed circuit boards? Anyway, it's a thing (Hot/cold girl and cold/hot soapy water not included).
:popcorn:
I particularly like the blood splatter on the floor.
 
The following users thanked this post: AndyBeez

Offline Gyro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9485
  • Country: gb
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #897 on: April 09, 2023, 12:07:35 pm »
Quote
I particularly like the blood splatter on the floor.

"Easy home assembly"  ;)
Best Regards, Chris
 
The following users thanked this post: AndyBeez

Offline Ed.Kloonk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4000
  • Country: au
  • Cat video aficionado
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #898 on: April 09, 2023, 12:11:21 pm »
Detachable legs.

Hmm.
iratus parum formica
 
The following users thanked this post: AndyBeez

Offline AndyBeez

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 856
  • Country: nu
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #899 on: April 10, 2023, 08:18:24 pm »
Let's do physics... a eureka moment. Actually the tub is big enough for two, provided they are very bendy :o

I wonder if those fake instructions suggest the bathers change the water between couples? Unlike (Marriott) hotel jacuzzis.

I still prefer the garage application of these. You can use it as a miniature paint spray booth too.

Anyway, it's been a few year's since I studied the laws of thermodynamics, but I'm sure this highly technical diagram illustrates just how these hot tubs are the next best thing to storing radioactive waste in the bidet.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf