Author Topic: dave should get one  (Read 3826 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline sony mavicaTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 472
  • Country: nz
Re: dave should get one
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2016, 11:55:21 am »
MORE POWER!
 

Offline tszaboo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7388
  • Country: nl
  • Current job: ATEX product design
Re: dave should get one
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2016, 12:07:25 pm »
There is nothing to be learned by tearing down CCC (cheap chinese crap). maybe how not to do things. The first one is probably fake or scam, the price is just not ok.
 

Offline BradC

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2106
  • Country: au
Re: dave should get one
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2016, 02:39:03 pm »
Sucker bait.
 

Offline AlxDroidDev

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 471
  • Country: br
    • Arduino Web Brasil
Re: dave should get one
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2016, 06:06:20 pm »
I had one of those cheap GoPro clones, that I got as a gift when I subscribed a magazine. I can't tell if it was that exact model, since they all looked alike.

I was unable to disassemble it since its 2 halves where glued together, rather than put together with screws. It did, however, looked like a cheap cellphone camera put on a case 100x the size it needed to be. Without its battery and supposedly waterproof case, it was no heavier than 3-4 AA cells. I made a few seconds of footage with it, and the video looked like the sensor didn't have full HD native resolution, but instead was an upscaled image of whatever crap its sensor could spill out.

"The nice thing about standards is that you have so many to choose from." (Andrew S. Tanenbaum)
 

Offline sony mavicaTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 472
  • Country: nz
Re: dave should get one
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2016, 09:48:43 pm »
I had one of those cheap GoPro clones, that I got as a gift when I subscribed a magazine. I can't tell if it was that exact model, since they all looked alike.

I was unable to disassemble it since its 2 halves where glued together, rather than put together with screws. It did, however, looked like a cheap cellphone camera put on a case 100x the size it needed to be. Without its battery and supposedly waterproof case, it was no heavier than 3-4 AA cells. I made a few seconds of footage with it, and the video looked like the sensor didn't have full HD native resolution, but instead was an upscaled image of whatever crap its sensor could spill out.

one i got that cost me $20 and is a 720p gopro style camera does a decent job
MORE POWER!
 

Offline Rasz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2616
  • Country: 00
    • My random blog.
Re: dave should get one
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2016, 02:28:18 am »
they both are 720 mjpeg encoded, upscaled VGA res fakes
Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
My fireplace is on fire, but in all the wrong places.
 

Offline dexters_lab

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1890
  • Country: gb
Re: dave should get one
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2016, 02:15:53 pm »
IIRC the real SJ4000 is not that bad a camera given it's a copy of a gopro, problem is there are fakes of the SJ4000 as well



Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf