| General > General Technical Chat |
| Strange Company rules and manipulations |
| << < (8/26) > >> |
| tooki:
--- Quote from: EEEnthusiast on February 09, 2020, 02:19:44 am ---Women dressing provocatively is an invitation for men in general... Instincts cannot be controlled by brains, or else the population would not grow exponentially in this world... --- End quote --- Buuuuullllshit. Of course men can control their instincts if they want to. If one is raised right, this is not a struggle. |
| David Hess:
--- Quote from: EEEnthusiast on February 09, 2020, 02:19:44 am ---Women dressing provocatively is an invitation for men in general... Instincts cannot be controlled by brains, or else the population would not grow exponentially in this world... --- End quote --- Women do not wear makeup to influence other women. Why isn't makeup considered sexual harassment? --- Quote from: EEEnthusiast on February 09, 2020, 03:27:20 am --- --- Quote from: tooki on February 09, 2020, 02:58:15 am --- --- Quote from: EEEnthusiast on February 09, 2020, 02:19:44 am ---Women dressing provocatively is an invitation for men in general... Instincts cannot be controlled by brains, or else the population would not grow exponentially in this world... --- End quote --- Buuuuullllshit. Of course men can control their instincts if they want to. If one is raised right, this is not a struggle. --- End quote --- Well, it may depend on the age of the person, the level of testosterone etc. One may use his intelligence to overcome instincts if trained hard, but the natural responses should not be curbed. It may lead to long term deviant behaviour among people. It may be better to use the intelligence to assist the instincts. That will take him to greater heights. --- End quote --- It requires training of the proper habits and conscious thought. It also goes against human nature. And women already complain about being left out of traditional male social activities for fear of being accused of sexual harassment. Invite the guys out for beers after work? Sure. Include female coworkers? That is a risk either way. |
| vk6zgo:
--- Quote from: EEVblog on September 20, 2019, 11:57:42 pm --- --- Quote from: Brutte on September 19, 2019, 07:20:05 pm ---One of my former corporations had an official regulation that we were not allowed to archive any emails that "could be of any value to government authorities" in case of a potential investigation and litigation. The limit was set to 3 months, older emails were wiped out. I suppose all corporations have these rules. --- End quote --- I've never heard of such a rule, and never worked at company that had that. --- End quote --- Me, neither, & frankly, I don't think it would fly in Oz, especially if the Australian Tax Office "came calling". ;D |
| David Hess:
--- Quote from: vk6zgo on February 09, 2020, 04:09:42 am ---Me, neither, & frankly, I don't think it would fly in Oz, especially if the Australian Tax Office "came calling". ;D --- End quote --- There are special minimum retention times for specific types of documents like financial where a general document destruction policy would not apply. |
| EEEnthusiast:
Yes inviting women for drinks may be really risky. Not inviting them when everyone goes for a round of drinks would amount to gender discrimination as well. Sticky situation... |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |