The plastics go in landfill so that they can't be turned into CO2 & pollution (by the clown-cils sending them for burning), the recycling centre gets the PCBs.
Great, so extract more oil, rather than burning the waste plastic we already have.
We need to reduce & stop both. And reduce the need for this copper (mentioned in the article) by reducing car use.
There has been several news articles recently about these waste burning power stations, nothing good about them & more polluting than burning coal.
David
No, we don't need to stop anything, because it won't make any difference on a global scale, as the likes of China and India will keep opening new coal mines and power stations. All we do is cripple ourselves even more than we're already doing. A lot of those emissions that we've supposedly reduced have simply been offshored.
There are many nonsensical articles, especially by the likes of the Guardian, which I consider to be a comic, more than a serious newspaper. It's not just the burning. Coal has to be mined and transported, as well as oil, along with other costs to the environment. For example, we burn wood chip, but it emits more than coal, when the fact it's shipped across the Atlantic is taken into account. It makes far more sense to burn the waste, as close to the source as possible.
, none of them take shitt such as CRTs anymore, there's no market for them and it all goes to a special landfill and the LF owners charge them good money to dump them
surely the glass could be melted down and reused
TV CRTs use lead glass. They won't recycle that through the normal glass recycling channels.
I wonder if it could be used for nuclear waste disposal? I suppose there isn't enough demand for that to cope with the large number of discarded CRTs.