General > General Technical Chat

Thoughts about Special and General Relativity from a Classical Perspective

<< < (4/6) > >>

aetherist:

--- Quote from: TimFox on December 06, 2022, 08:45:12 pm ---Aetherist defines a "good" MMX result as one that agrees with his beliefs.
There are other well-done MMX results that disagree with him.
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.020401
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjx58LK7eX7AhUBh3IEHU4OCGE4ChAWegQILhAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcab.unime.it%2Fjournals%2Findex.php%2FAAPP%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2FAAPP.96S1A2%2FAAPP96S1A2&usg=AOvVaw1NvlUM_r5WZySD0tkfHvMj

--- End quote ---
We have been throo this before. I have pointed out that Prof Reg Cahill has found the proper calibration for standard MMXs, & his calibration tells us that vacuum-mode MMXs give a null result for the aetherwind (at least they do for the standard 2nd order kind of measurements) -- MMXs have to be in gas-mode -- hence all very modern MMXs (ie the ones u always refer to) fail.
However, modern MMXs are so accurate that they have in fact measured the aetherwind at 3rd order scales.

TimFox:

--- Quote from: aetherist on December 07, 2022, 03:17:01 am ---
--- Quote from: TimFox on December 06, 2022, 08:45:12 pm ---Aetherist defines a "good" MMX result as one that agrees with his beliefs.
There are other well-done MMX results that disagree with him.
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.020401
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjx58LK7eX7AhUBh3IEHU4OCGE4ChAWegQILhAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcab.unime.it%2Fjournals%2Findex.php%2FAAPP%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2FAAPP.96S1A2%2FAAPP96S1A2&usg=AOvVaw1NvlUM_r5WZySD0tkfHvMj

--- End quote ---
We have been throo this before. I have pointed out that Prof Reg Cahill has found the proper calibration for standard MMXs, & his calibration tells us that vacuum-mode MMXs give a null result for the aetherwind (at least they do for the standard 2nd order kind of measurements) -- MMXs have to be in gas-mode -- hence all very modern MMXs (ie the ones u always refer to) fail.
However, modern MMXs are so accurate that they have in fact measured the aetherwind at 3rd order scales.

--- End quote ---
I find the claim that MMX must be done in a gas atmosphere interesting, since the most precise ones have been done in vacuum.  Apparently, a VacIon pump removes the aether from the experiment.

aetherist:

--- Quote from: TimFox on December 07, 2022, 04:19:08 am ---
--- Quote from: aetherist on December 07, 2022, 03:17:01 am ---
--- Quote from: TimFox on December 06, 2022, 08:45:12 pm ---Aetherist defines a "good" MMX result as one that agrees with his beliefs.
There are other well-done MMX results that disagree with him.
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.020401
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjx58LK7eX7AhUBh3IEHU4OCGE4ChAWegQILhAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcab.unime.it%2Fjournals%2Findex.php%2FAAPP%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2FAAPP.96S1A2%2FAAPP96S1A2&usg=AOvVaw1NvlUM_r5WZySD0tkfHvMj

--- End quote ---
We have been throo this before. I have pointed out that Prof Reg Cahill has found the proper calibration for standard MMXs, & his calibration tells us that vacuum-mode MMXs give a null result for the aetherwind (at least they do for the standard 2nd order kind of measurements) -- MMXs have to be in gas-mode -- hence all very modern MMXs (ie the ones u always refer to) fail.
However, modern MMXs are so accurate that they have in fact measured the aetherwind at 3rd order scales.

--- End quote ---
I find the claim that MMX must be done in a gas atmosphere interesting, since the most precise ones have been done in vacuum.  Apparently, a VacIon pump removes the aether from the experiment.

--- End quote ---
The most precise MMX ever was Demjanov's -- which was actually in twin media (carbon bisulphide gas & air).
Vacuum mode MMXs are a good test of Lorentz length contraction only (unless they are accurate enuff to measure 3rd order effects)(which the modern MMXs can do).
In gas mode the (very small) MMX reading is due to the additional action of (a) Fresnel Drag (kind of effect) slowing the speed of light in one leg & fasting it in the other.
I am the world authority on some aspects of oldendays MMXs.

TimFox:
VacIonTM pumps are less efficient in pumping chemically inert gases (e.g., argon and helium)--perhaps the aether is too inert to be pumped?

aetherist:

--- Quote from: kevin original on November 30, 2022, 06:31:45 am ---What gets me is that the Coulomb is not considered an SI base unit, instead the Ampere is the base unit and the Coulomb is a derived unit from the Ampere being Amps times seconds. Shows how much faith they have in their own definitions. If you were doing a dimensional analysis and using Ampere in place of Coulomb then you wouldn't realize there is a hidden second dimension in there screwing with your intuition.

--- End quote ---
U should google Ivor Catt re his electricity theory.
Allso Forrest Bishop.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod