Author Topic: Thoughts about Special and General Relativity from a Classical Perspective  (Read 2591 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline aetherist

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • !
  • Posts: 621
  • Country: au
  • The aether will return. It never left.
Re: Thoughts about Special and General Relativity from a Classical Perspective
« Reply #25 on: December 09, 2022, 07:37:27 pm »
Welp, turns out the magnetic field isn't real. I just learned/realized/allowedmyselftoaccept that magnetism is a mathematical field because the true source is relativistic activity from changing electric field. At least the electric field is physical/real for now? It annoyingly vindicates Ken Wheeler's single dielectric field theory. Ken would probably have some good ideas if only he knew what he was talking about. I can't really blame him considering Eric Dollard is his source of electrical theory. I'm passive aggressively stirring the pot in case there are any Ken/Eric fans out there. Their ideas and terminology may be wrong but you can't blame a guy for starting with a logical conceptual explanation and then working from there. The thing is, you shouldn't just dismiss Einstein and the current scientific thought out of spite. Another guy I found uses the youtube handle "ask us whatever". I like that he actually uses the math to justify his views. I agree that length contraction doesn't make any real sense but he has some other misconceptions out of the gate that I don't agree with. I agree that the speed of light changes, but only in a gravitational field or conductor of light/electricity but not in a vacuum.
Length Contraction due to velocity of aetherwind is a certainty. Except it might involve a Width Dilation. Or, a combination of LC & WD (Lorentz). We cant be sure.
Time Dilation -- there aint no such thing. But we will have changes of ticking of all processes due to change in aetherwind.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf