Author Topic: Dennis Ritchie: 1941-2011.  (Read 3112 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline firewalkerTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2450
  • Country: gr
Dennis Ritchie: 1941-2011.
« on: October 13, 2011, 11:56:27 am »
Quote
#include <stdio.h>

int main()
{
    printf("RIP Dennis.\n");
    return 0;
}

Become a realist, stay a dreamer.

 

Offline Ferroto

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 289
  • Country: ca
Re: Dennis Ritchie: 1941-2011.
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2011, 12:36:03 pm »
First Steve Jobs now the father of UNIX and C :(

userdel -r DRitchie

userdel -r SJobs

RIP.
 

Online Mechatrommer

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11643
  • Country: my
  • reassessing directives...
Re: Dennis Ritchie: 1941-2011.
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2011, 04:31:41 pm »
Ritchie was a genius in Computing Science just as Einstein in Physics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Ritchie
http://forwardthinking.pcmag.com/linux-unix/289134-remembering-dennis-ritchie-software-pioneer#fbid=42tlYWenE5q
http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/dmr/

Code: [Select]
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int main()
{
    if (!c) { software = nil; }

    if (!software) {
        MAC = nil;
        UNIX = nil;
        WINDOWS = nil;
        PIC = nil;
        AVR = nil;
        MCU = nil;
    }

    if (!MCU) {
        iphone = nil;
        everything = nil;
        people = stone_age;
    };

    while (c) {
        printf("RIP Dennis.\n");
    };

    return END_OF_WORLD;
}

Nature: Evolution and the Illusion of Randomness (Stephen L. Talbott): Its now indisputable that... organisms “expertise” contextualizes its genome, and its nonsense to say that these powers are under the control of the genome being contextualized - Barbara McClintock
 

Offline slateraptor

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 833
  • Country: us
Re: Dennis Ritchie: 1941-2011.
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2011, 02:04:55 pm »
It's sad to see that NYTimes has relegated such tragic news to their "More Technology News" section. Oh, how society has failed miserably at properly honoring he who has quietly given so much to her. :(
 

Offline AntiProtonBoy

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 988
  • Country: au
  • I think I passed the Voight-Kampff test.
Re: Dennis Ritchie: 1941-2011.
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2011, 02:06:20 pm »
Bit of a bummer he's gone. But C lives on.
 

Offline ellisg

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
Re: Dennis Ritchie: 1941-2011.
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2011, 02:31:35 am »
I have read a lot of posts on one of the social networking sites concerning how Jobs have gotten more attention when he passed, far better from one of the pioneers of computer programming. Though how you are going to be cherished would not really be determined on how much work you put through but how you have touched users and inspired them.  I mean, when it comes to the amount of work, I am certain that Ritchie would be getting the upperhand.
 

Online Mechatrommer

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11643
  • Country: my
  • reassessing directives...
Re: Dennis Ritchie: 1941-2011.
« Reply #6 on: October 20, 2011, 03:08:42 am »
It's sad to see that NYTimes has relegated such tragic news to their "More Technology News" section. Oh, how society has failed miserably at properly honoring he who has quietly given so much to her. :(
I have read a lot of posts on one of the social networking sites concerning how Jobs have gotten more attention when he passed, far better from one of the pioneers of computer programming.
this is the "hidden" truth of "money matters". its politics i'm speculating... "money politics" and "butt licking" stuffs. and Steve's demise (may he RIP) is also a good prove how money and science cannot buy everything.
money = a system made by human in an attempt to try to make a perfect world

« Last Edit: October 20, 2011, 03:25:00 am by Mechatrommer »
Nature: Evolution and the Illusion of Randomness (Stephen L. Talbott): Its now indisputable that... organisms “expertise” contextualizes its genome, and its nonsense to say that these powers are under the control of the genome being contextualized - Barbara McClintock
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf