General > General Technical Chat
Unusual design of a free-flow hydropower station
Andy Chee:
--- Quote from: Hydro on February 05, 2024, 08:37:39 am ---I ask langwadt to participate in peer review of a technology if he considers himself an expert and takes responsibility to state anything about possible peer review.
Or is he afraid to be an expert?
--- End quote ---
Your peer review request is not genuine. Calling someone afraid is not peer review, that's bullying.
Also peer review requires publishing article author names. For some reason, you keep editing your articles and replacing the author names with ***@***.com
Hydro:
--- Quote from: Andy Chee on February 05, 2024, 09:04:16 am ---
--- Quote from: Hydro on February 05, 2024, 08:37:39 am ---I ask langwadt to participate in peer review of a technology if he considers himself an expert and takes responsibility to state anything about possible peer review.
Or is he afraid to be an expert?
--- End quote ---
Your peer review request is not genuine. Calling someone afraid is not peer review, that's bullying.
Also peer review requires publishing article author names. For some reason, you keep editing your articles and replacing the author names with ***@***.com
--- End quote ---
No, what is called bullying is not my assumption, that my opponent afraid, but his comparison of “magic free-flow turbine” with sliced bread. And his desire to find out what I will do if the experts decide so.
I answered his question in detail - I gave him three possible options. But he doesn’t answer.
Yes, I expressed myself somewhat incorrectly about “peer review”. This is usually used for scientific articles.
But I just want to find out an expert assessment of the technology and the turbine that uses this technology.
But who wants to give a peer review of the article, then please, here is an article.
I do not have the right to publish their names and addresses here in order to ensure the most unbiased approach and not to make unnecessary advertising for the authors on the forum. This is the only reason not to advertise their names on this site.
And moreover, I can still conclude that this topic is very interesting to many, despite their statements that they left, unsubscribed and that they are not interested.
Someone:
Purpose of a journal article is to clearly communicate the problem and solution. Since neither are presented clearly in that article it fails before needing to consider the illogical conclusions and claims.
Equally Hydro, if this is so interesting and groundbreaking why can its important points not be clearly communicated to others?
Hydro:
--- Quote from: Someone on February 05, 2024, 10:00:12 am ---Purpose of a journal article is to clearly communicate the problem and solution. Since neither are presented clearly in that article it fails before needing to consider the illogical conclusions and claims.
Equally Hydro, if this is so interesting and groundbreaking why can its important points not be clearly communicated to others?
--- End quote ---
Maybe I'm wrong, then correct me, pls
It seems to me that the article quite clearly sets out the problem - to improve the free flow of hydroelectric power stations.
Solution - formulas were derived and the operating principle of such a hydraulic turbine was invented.
Explanations are given for its scale modeling taking into account the coefficients of hydrodynamic similarity - the Reynolds number and the Froude number.
I’m unlikely to be able to better convey the essence of the solution to the problem than was done in the article, which is why I posted all the articles and comments that there are on this matter.
If you see some illogical conclusions and claims, then I can try to answer them as I understand it.
Please....
Andy Chee:
--- Quote from: Hydro on February 05, 2024, 09:52:35 am ---I do not have the right to publish their names and addresses here in order to ensure the most unbiased approach and not to make unnecessary advertising for the authors on the forum. This is the only reason not to advertise their names on this site.
--- End quote ---
You have the right to publish the DOI of the article, for example:
https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020267
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.181
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1414137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2019.100605
https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015595339
DOI is the standard method of sharing articles, not edited screenshot images you made in photoshop or microsoft paint.
Please post the original DOI to your articles.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version