I ask langwadt to participate in peer review of a technology if he considers himself an expert and takes responsibility to state anything about possible peer review.
Or is he afraid to be an expert?
Your peer review request is not genuine. Calling someone afraid is not peer review, that's bullying.
Also peer review requires publishing article author names. For some reason, you keep editing your articles and replacing the author names with ***@***.com
No, what is called bullying is not my assumption, that my opponent afraid, but his comparison of “magic free-flow turbine” with sliced bread. And his desire to find out what I will do if the experts decide so.
I answered his question in detail - I gave him three possible options. But he doesn’t answer.
Yes, I expressed myself somewhat incorrectly about
“peer review”. This is usually used for scientific articles.
But I just want to find out an
expert assessment of the technology and the turbine that uses this technology.
But who wants to give a peer review of the article,
then please, here is an article.I do not have the right to publish their names and addresses here in order to ensure the most unbiased approach and not to make unnecessary advertising for the authors on the forum. This is the only reason not to advertise their names on this site.
And moreover, I can still conclude that this topic is very interesting to many, despite their statements that they left, unsubscribed and that they are not interested.