General > General Technical Chat
"Veritasium" (YT) - "The Big Misconception About Electricity" ?
TimFox:
No, the anisotropy is of the radiation itself, and concerns its origin.
The dipole anisotropy, first figure in the page cited, concerns the motion of the terrestial observation with respect to the rest frame of the cosmic radiation, presumably indicating where the original bang occurred with respect to our galaxy, etc. It corresponds nicely to the Earth's annual orbital motion.
Further measurements have demonstrated other features of the anisotropy, less magnitude than the primary dipole distribution.
aetherist:
--- Quote from: HuronKing on February 25, 2022, 10:20:13 pm ---LOLOL
"CMBR is rubbish and doesn't exist according to an uncorroborated Soviet antenna and the opinions of a medical radiologist"
"Of course CMBR proves the aetherwind."
I really ought to be doing other things but I can't help myself. :-DD
--- End quote ---
U dont seem to understand that if the CMBR proves the aetherwind then that undermines Einsteinian stuff which undermines bigbang stuff which undermines CMBR which brings us back where we started.
The Soviets also sank the CMBR stuff done by theusofa WMAP & COBE families teams. Theusofa teams got Nobels, but the Soviets didnt.
The Soviets launched the first such satellite in 1983 -- Relikt-1. Later they launched Relikt-2 [edit][Relikt-2 never launched]. These showed that the later calibrations by theusofa were rubbish, because it was discovered that Relikt-1 suffered due to a large signal from Earth, & this had to be overcome by Relikt-2 by using a different orbit etc. [edit][Relikt-2 never launched]
aetherist:
--- Quote from: TimFox on February 25, 2022, 10:33:42 pm ---No, the anisotropy is of the radiation itself, and concerns its origin.
The dipole anisotropy, first figure in the page cited, concerns the motion of the terrestial observation with respect to the rest frame of the cosmic radiation, presumably indicating where the original bang occurred with respect to our galaxy, etc. It corresponds nicely to the Earth's annual orbital motion.
Further measurements have demonstrated other features of the anisotropy, less magnitude than the primary dipole distribution.
--- End quote ---
Nope. Any anisotropy supports aetherwind.
However, the CMBR anisotropy has about the right speed of 400 km/s, but it is about 90 deg away from the historical direction of the aetherwind.
But that 90 deg is not a big deal, koz the aetherwind can only be measured near Earth, whereas the CMBR (if it exists) is outside our galaxy.
I am not sure what u mean re Earth's orbit. This is 30 km/s. And it should show up somewhere in that there 400 km/s i suppose, bearing in mind that satellites orbit the Earth, & Planck is sitting on Earth.
TimFox:
"Any anisotropy supports aetherwind"
That statement is logically absurd. You could describe a specific hypothetical anisotropy that you claim would be caused by an aetherwind, and then someone else could easily postulate an anisotropy contrary to that.
Be more careful about absolute terms such as "any", "all", "none", etc.
HuronKing:
--- Quote from: aetherist on February 25, 2022, 10:41:08 pm ---
U dont seem to understand that if the CMBR proves the aetherwind then that undermines Einsteinian stuff which undermines bigbang stuff which undermines CMBR which brings us back where we started.
--- End quote ---
You don't seem to understand how logic works. >:D
--- Quote ---The Soviets also sank the CMBR stuff done by theusofa WMAP & COBE families teams. Theusofa teams got Nobels, but the Soviets didnt.
The Soviets launched the first such satellite in 1983 -- Relikt-1. Later they launched Relikt-2.
--- End quote ---
Relikt-1 confirmed CMBR and Relikt-2 never launched. WTF are you talking about?
--- Quote ---These showed that the later calibrations by theusofa were rubbish, because it was discovered that Relikt-1 suffered due to a large signal from Earth, & this had to be overcome by Relikt-2 by using a different orbit etc.
--- End quote ---
You're just all over the place. Do you have a source that says Relikt-2 launched? If so, where is the data?
The Soviet paper on the subject found their measurements in Relikt-1 to be in agreement with those of COBE.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.258...71K/abstract
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version