General > General Technical Chat

"Veritasium" (YT) - "The Big Misconception About Electricity" ?

<< < (272/396) > >>

aetherist:

--- Quote from: TimFox on February 25, 2022, 10:52:43 pm ---"Any anisotropy supports aetherwind"
That statement is logically absurd.  You could describe a specific hypothetical anisotropy that you claim would be caused by an aetherwind, and then someone else could easily postulate an anisotropy contrary to that.
Be more careful about absolute terms such as "any", "all", "none", etc.

--- End quote ---
Ok, i suppose that i have to agree that anisotropy duznt necessarily support aetherwind.
I would like to know more about BB theory, & CMBR theory.
I suppose that the motion of the solar system relative to surface of last scattering duznt in theory need an aetherwind.
But the whole truth will emerge shortly.

Anyhow, allow me to warn u that a CMBR duznt necessarily support the bigbang.

https://philpapers.org/rec/ASSHOT

History of the 2.7 K Temperature Prior to Penzias and Wilson
A. K. T. Assis*  M. C. D. Neves
We present the history of estimates of the temperature of intergalactic space. We begin with the works of Guillaume and Eddington on the temperature of interstellar space due to starlight belonging to our Milky Way galaxy. Then we discuss works relating to cosmic radiation, concentrating on Regener and Nernst. We also discuss Finlay-Freundlich’s and Max Born’s important research on this topic. Finally, we present the work of Gamow and collaborators. We show that the models based on a Universe in dynamical equilibrium without expansion predicted the 2.7 K temperature prior to and better than models based on the Big Bang.

Our conclusion is that the discovery of the CBR by Penzias and Wilson is a decisive factor in favour of a Universe in dynamical equilibrium, and against models of an expanding Universe, such as the Big Bang and the steady-state.

adx:

--- Quote from: HuronKing on February 25, 2022, 10:58:06 pm ---Relikt-1 confirmed CMBR and Relikt-2 never launched. WTF are you talking about?

--- End quote ---

The whole failure to launch was faked. The absence of sensor data was actually recorded during an engineered quiet period while it was up in space, specially timed to look like it had not launched. The lack of graticules on the film supposedly taken from ground were erased from shots taken in space, and the forlorn looks on the faces of scientists were actually from actors paid to look sad, while the real scientists partied on vodka with NASA conspirators via video link. Photos of Relikt-2 on the ground are actually of Relikt-1 while the former was in outer space. When the experiments returned to Earth, tapes were rewound to different points and vacuum tubes were filled with air to cover up evidence of space.

aetherist:

--- Quote from: HuronKing on February 25, 2022, 10:58:06 pm ---
--- Quote from: aetherist on February 25, 2022, 10:41:08 pm ---U dont seem to understand that if the CMBR proves the aetherwind then that undermines Einsteinian stuff which undermines bigbang stuff which undermines CMBR which brings us back where we started.
--- End quote ---
You don't seem to understand how logic works.  >:D

--- Quote ---The Soviets also sank the CMBR stuff done by theusofa WMAP & COBE families teams. Theusofa teams got Nobels, but the Soviets didnt.
The Soviets launched the first such satellite in 1983 -- Relikt-1. Later they launched Relikt-2.
--- End quote ---
Relikt-1 confirmed CMBR and Relikt-2 never launched. WTF are you talking about?
--- Quote ---These showed that the later calibrations by theusofa were rubbish, because it was discovered that Relikt-1 suffered due to a large signal from Earth, & this had to be overcome by Relikt-2 by using a different orbit etc.
--- End quote ---
You're just all over the place. Do you have a source that says Relikt-2 launched? If so, where is the data?

The Soviet paper on the subject found their measurements in Relikt-1 to be in agreement with those of COBE.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.258...71K/abstract
--- End quote ---
Yes i think u are correct. Relikt-2 never launched. The shortcomings of Relikt-1 had been used in the design of Relikt-2 but it never launched. Yes i was being lazy & relying mainly on old memories, dangerous.

aetherist:

--- Quote from: adx on February 25, 2022, 11:46:35 pm ---
--- Quote from: HuronKing on February 25, 2022, 10:58:06 pm ---Relikt-1 confirmed CMBR and Relikt-2 never launched. WTF are you talking about?
--- End quote ---
The whole failure to launch was faked. The absence of sensor data was actually recorded during an engineered quiet period while it was up in space, specially timed to look like it had not launched. The lack of graticules on the film supposedly taken from ground were erased from shots taken in space, and the forlorn looks on the faces of scientists were actually from actors paid to look sad, while the real scientists partied on vodka with NASA conspirators via video link. Photos of Relikt-2 on the ground are actually of Relikt-1 while the former was in outer space. When the experiments returned to Earth, tapes were rewound to different points and vacuum tubes were filled with air to cover up evidence of space.
--- End quote ---
Ok ok i have to apologise for Relikt-2 not launching. I think that it was koz theusofa had more $$$ to throw at the time. The bust up of the USSR might have had an effect.

All i know for sure is that Relikt-1 was put into orbit to make sure that it was out of reach of pigeons. But i reckon that my championship winning blue-barred might have given it a fright.
Anyhow the Relikt-1 had an apogee of 700,000 km just to make sure.

It is well known that the Nobel committee was back then dominated by pigeon lovers, so the Soviets didnt have a chance.

adx:
https://www.spacepigeon.net/

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod