| General > General Technical Chat |
| "Veritasium" (YT) - "The Big Misconception About Electricity" ? |
| << < (274/396) > >> |
| aetherist:
--- Quote from: HuronKing on February 26, 2022, 10:21:10 pm --- --- End quote --- Feynman has never said anything useful or interesting to me & my science, but i havnt spent much time on him. Much of what he says in the youtube supports me. He reckons that the sun shines from Einstein's bum, hence that lowers Feynman to the category of someone who is unlikely to teach me anything worthwhile. And i believe that i can learn something from anyone, but Feynman might be an exception. I dont know what he thought about aether. However he might have liked my electons. Here are some of his better sayings. Most of his sayings did not impress me at all. A very great deal more truth can become known than can be proven. Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. Science alone of all the subjects contains within itself the lesson of the danger of belief in the infallibility of the greatest teachers of the preceding generation. The electron is a theory we use; it is so useful in understanding the way nature works that we can almost call it real |
| HuronKing:
--- Quote from: aetherist on February 27, 2022, 01:28:04 am ---Feynman has never said anything useful or interesting to me & my science, but i havnt spent much time on him. --- End quote --- Of course. Because you're allergic to learning. https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/ --- Quote ---Much of what he says in the youtube supports me. --- End quote --- Lol. "I don't know what he says. It isn't interesting. But it supports me." Gawd you are an endless source of completely unaware self-parody. :-DD --- Quote ---He reckons that the sun shines from Einstein's bum, hence that lowers Feynman to the category of someone who is unlikely to teach me anything worthwhile. And i believe that i can learn something from anyone, but Feynman might be an exception. --- End quote --- Indeed. You should stay far away from Feynman lest you learn something useful. >:D --- Quote ---I dont know what he thought about aether. --- End quote --- Lucky for you, he wrote down what he thought about aether. But I wouldn't open this link if I were you - you might break out in an allergic rash: https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_15.html --- Quote ---However he might have liked my electons. --- End quote --- Nah. He said in the video I posted what he would've thought about you. You're just another crank asking the safecracker if they tried combination 20-30-40. I was hoping you might've watched his remarks and maybe, just maybe, might've understood why academics ignore you. But nope. Ah well. |
| aetherist:
--- Quote from: HuronKing on February 27, 2022, 01:49:08 am --- --- Quote from: aetherist on February 27, 2022, 01:28:04 am ---Feynman has never said anything useful or interesting to me & my science, but i havnt spent much time on him. --- End quote --- Of course. Because you're allergic to learning. https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/ --- Quote ---Much of what he says in the youtube supports me. --- End quote --- Lol."I don't know what he says. It isn't interesting. But it supports me." Gawd you are an endless source of completely unaware self-parody. :-DD --- Quote ---He reckons that the sun shines from Einstein's bum, hence that lowers Feynman to the category of someone who is unlikely to teach me anything worthwhile. And i believe that i can learn something from anyone, but Feynman might be an exception. --- End quote --- Indeed. You should stay far away from Feynman lest you learn something useful. >:D --- Quote ---I dont know what he thought about aether. --- End quote --- Lucky for you, he wrote down what he thought about aether. But I wouldn't open this link if I were you - you might break out in an allergic rash: https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_15.html --- Quote ---However he might have liked my electons. --- End quote --- Nah. He said in the video I posted what he would've thought about you. You're just another crank asking the safecracker if they tried combination 20-30-40. I was hoping you might've watched his remarks and maybe, just maybe, might've understood why academics ignore you. But nope. Ah well. --- End quote --- I had a look. Omigosh. I didnt realize just how stupid Feynman was. In less than 60 sec i see that he thort that Einstein believed in mass increase with speed. No. He reckoned that the MMXs were null. No. He believed in time dilation. Wrong. I will read the rest later. What a dill. At the end he parrots the usual krapp that an electron can go faster than slowed light. Nope. Impossible. Another modern science mistake. U using the safecracker story as an example tells me that not only do u not understand electricity but u dont understand logic. The electron drift theory is not an example of someone trying to find something, it is an example of someone saying that they have found something. And along kums me & tells them that they have not found what they were looking for, & i tell them the good news that i have found what they are looking for. And they abuse me. Which shows that they were not really interested in the thing they were looking for, they were mainly interested in the glory of finding it. And, when they had trouble finding it, they hurriedly snuck in fake theory, that was impossible, & they claimed that it was a good theory, exactly fitting what they were looking for. And then anytime that their fake theory looked like it might be revealed to be fake they put up a hell of a commotion, spitting & yelling & spinning round real fast, & exuding foul repulsive stinx, with no end of apostles & disciples keeping guard on many forums. Now, go find a story that parallels that scenario. U need not go far. |
| HuronKing:
--- Quote from: aetherist on February 27, 2022, 02:01:06 am ---I had a look. Omigosh. I didnt realize just how stupid Feynman was. In less than 60 sec i see that he thort that Einstein believed in mass increase with speed. No. He reckoned that the MMXs were null. No. He believed in time dilation. Wrong. I will read the rest later. What a dill. --- End quote --- And the rash is breaking out as predicted. I tried to warn you. >:D |
| aetherist:
--- Quote from: aetherist on February 26, 2022, 09:25:51 pm --- --- Quote from: SandyCox on February 26, 2022, 01:34:17 pm ---What does your new theory say about a dipole antenna. What does its radiation pattern look like? For a transmitting and receiving dipole? --- End quote --- I think that an insulated dipole or a wet dipole would in effect have a shorter L. And i suspect that that would lower its effective frequencies. This might lower the antenna's happy frequency by the ratio of the speed of light in air to the speed of light in water or to the speed of light in plastic. I am not sure whether "happy frequency" is a valid technical term, but it should be. We might have the Happiness of an antenna (units needed here). The inverse could be called Haplessness. adx said that insulation on an antenna affected its power by only a few %, not the 0.67 to 1.00 ratio that my electons suggest. But, adx should have been referring to the ratios of the happy frequencies, not the ratio of the powers. --- Quote from: SandyCox on February 26, 2022, 01:34:17 pm ---Can you point us to some of the books your relative wrote. What exactly happened to him? --- End quote --- I emailed Tony Wakefield (he has been mentioned in this thread), he is a ham & lives in Melbourne too & might know of Diamond & his books. Diamond was with his club cleaning rubbish from the center median of a dual highway in Melbourne when a say builder's trailer came off & hit him, he didn’t see it coming, he was in hospital for months, had brain damage, was in the same ward as my wife (his cousin) who died of brain cancer, & they didn’t know that the other was there. I don’t know how he is nowadays. I remember him telling me that his favorit person was Faraday. I think i argued with him that electricity was not due to electron drift, & i might have argued with him that radio waves were not photons, & i might have mentioned the aetherwind affecting the speed of radio waves, it was about 6 years ago, i didn’t yet have my new (electon) electricity theory back then. --- End quote --- Good news, Tony Wakefield emailed me back with the following info. Subject: Books by Drew Diamond --- Radio Projects for the Amateur vk3xu. Regarding Antennas depends on frequency the rain will lower the resonance frequency so will the insulation, not by much. Also if rain is charged can cause noise level increase. Best spotted with large drops of infrequent rain. Lots of stuff via a google. google https://rudys.typepad.com/files/insulated-wire-and-antennas.pdf https://rudys.typepad.com/files/chapter-3--1.pdf https://www.kb6nu.com/should-dipoles-made-with-insulated-wire-be-made-shorter/ https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/bare-or-insulated-ground-radials-info.596884/ https://www.facebook.com/VK3ER/photos/pcb.537100423137143/537100129803839 https://www.google.com.au/search?q=%22drew+diamond%22+vk3xu&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjvucTAk5_2AhXEzqACHWY_DWoQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=%22drew+diamond%22+vk3xu&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzIECAAQGDoFCAAQgAQ6BAgAEB5QvAhY8zZgokpoAHAAeACAAdsQiAHKPJIBCTYtNS4wLjEuMZgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&sclient=img&ei=RgwbYu_-J8Sdg8UP5v600AY&bih=950&biw=1920 I think i can see where all of the hams are going wrong. They know that they have to cut 3% to 5% off an antenna if it uses insulated wire. But, i can see that what is happening is that they are getting a 2 to 3 ratio reduction in frequency, which is hidden to them koz of harmonics. And all that the hams can see is the obvious 3% to 5% deficiency in frequency due to it being not exactly 2 to 3. I ask u am i a genius or what. But there's more. I have also worked out how kum rain plus insulation has an effect. Tony's email gave me a clue. He said that large drops have the effect of putting charge on the antenna, which creates noise. Well, this tells me that the wetness on the outside of an insulated antenna creates a capacitor. The water has a charge, probably a negative charge. And, worse, the insulation itself acts as a multiplier for the capacitance, as per a standard capacitor. Thats why the 0.5 mm of water outside the plastic acts like it acts. And, thats why the thicker the plastic the larger the effect. I am having a great day today. I hope adx reads this. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |