| General > General Technical Chat |
| "Veritasium" (YT) - "The Big Misconception About Electricity" ? |
| << < (285/396) > >> |
| aetherist:
--- Quote from: HuronKing on March 01, 2022, 01:15:35 am --- --- Quote from: aetherist on March 01, 2022, 12:11:55 am --- --- Quote from: penfold on March 01, 2022, 12:01:15 am --- --- Quote from: aetherist on February 28, 2022, 09:28:01 pm ---[...] I am ok with old (deep electron drift) electricity, but i say that it is insignificant, compared to my new (surface hugging electon) electricity, which includes my new (surface electron flow) electricity. The problem with electron drift electricity is that the speed of light in Cu is about 10 m/s, ie c/30,000,000, badly below c/1. And, it duznt explain how the speed of electricity in an insulated wire is 2c/3. Electron beams are ok, they are compatible with my elections. [...] --- End quote --- Is that all this 'theory' is resting on? Because, no, you're wrong, conventional EM theory predicts the speed of "electricity" in wires very well. In terms of voltage, current, dissipated energy and stored energy, conventional electricity explains it all, and the velocities at which they propagate, and it does it very well. Is that seriously the basis of your theory? I'm actually disappointed, we were just getting to the good bit and we hadn't even got to causality where the real fun begins. --- End quote --- How do drifting electrons give c/1 for bare wire, & 2c/3 for insulated wire? --- End quote --- Do you know what "permittivity" means? --- End quote --- No, but i doubt that anyone knows what permittivity means. Firstly u would have to know what permittivity is. In other words u would have to know what causes permittivity. Obviously it has to do with the aether. But in a basic sense i think it is a non-constant constant for a material or a medium that can help u to calculate the electrostatic force tween static charges sitting in that medium. In copper the permittivity is almost infinite. What does that do to the speed of electricity in a copper wire. The speed of light in a copper wire is nearly zero m/s. The poor old drifting electrons slowly drifting at 1 m/hr inside the wire where the permittivity is almost infinite can see their lucky siblings zipping around happily on the surface of the wire, where the permitivity of the air is nearnuff 1.0. Depressing. |
| Alex Eisenhut:
If you control the aether, can you manipulate electons to make 500mL of Aberlour 18 for me? |
| SiliconWizard:
I thought the concept of aether (that I was more used to seeing spelled ether) was long abandoned, but apparently not. Even seems to be a whole "community" of people around that idea. |
| adx:
I had wondered about the 'other sort' of tobacco - but it was too obvious to account for all the experimental effects. Then "Tobacco smoke was whisked axially upwards" hinted at far-reaching (for days after) experimental consequences of quadru-bottle triple-distilled double-shot single-malt, but even that volume of aethernol can't support the sheer magnitude of the reported experimental (d)effects. No, the only poison of choice which suits the dire weirdness of this thread is that of John Lilly and NASA's dolphin sex house: https://boingboing.net/2021/02/22/the-dolphin-house-a-documentary-on-john-lilly-and-margaret-howes-attempts-to-communicate-with-dolphins.html Science. |
| TimFox:
"I don’t know much about atomic clocks. Some i think have a quartz crystal as a part of their circuitry. So i am not sure whether they are truly atomic." Atomic clocks rely on the energy levels of atoms, so that a transition corresponds (by elementary quantum mechanics) to a frequency, as in the definition I quoted. If you don't understand that, how can you talk about the difference between quartz and atom-beam clocks? |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |