General > General Technical Chat
"Veritasium" (YT) - "The Big Misconception About Electricity" ?
<< < (321/396) > >>
aetherist:

--- Quote from: penfold on March 17, 2022, 12:32:52 am ---
--- Quote from: aetherist on March 17, 2022, 12:14:24 am ---In the meantime for sure i am waging a little war on English, but of course i dont want to overdo it, i suppose that koz & woz & probly etc might confuse readers from non-English speaking countries.
Would u like to return to the year 1600?
--- End quote ---
The townspeople of New Lorentzburg have also raised concerns over the new language, there's a running conspiracy theory that you are trying to prevent them from being able to read literature, learn for themselves, and that it makes it easier for you to censor their concerns.
The angst is growing as they are still waiting for the electricity system to be upgraded for 'new electrons'.
--- End quote ---
In the oldendays dunkemhigh would have had me burnt at the stake for my devil talk.
Or praps dunk me low into the drink for my witch spelling ………
Wiki…………. In medieval times until the early 18th century, ducking was a way used to establish whether a suspect was a witch.  The ducking stools were first used for this purpose but ducking was later inflicted without the chair. In this instance the subject's right thumb was bound to her left big toe. A rope was tied around the waist of the accused and she was thrown into a river or deep pond. If she floated, it was deemed that she was in league with the devil, rejecting the baptismal water. If she sank, she was "cleared. And dead"…….

bsfeechannel:

--- Quote from: aetherist on March 16, 2022, 09:53:19 pm ---The modern peer review of the 1962 muon X criticized the calculation of the effect of the slowing & loss of energy of muons arising from the mass of the atmosphere tween the altitudes of the 2 tests

--- End quote ---

Peer review. What a cheeky devil. Scientists and pseudo-scientists are not peers.
adx:

--- Quote from: aetherist on March 17, 2022, 12:38:25 am ---If it were not for the scientific godma of the Roman Catholic Church humans might have stood on the Moon in July 969, instead of July 1969.

--- End quote ---

What's wrong with that? Standing on the moon is dangerous.

Humans are notoriously forgetful and complacent - one particularly impetuous and neglectful soul opens the door of Virgin's latest "Mary" spacecraft one fateful morning in 969, steps out onto the regolith, yawns and notices the water boiling off their tongue. 12 to 15 seconds later it's on the ground, mashing that face you just want to punch in that open mouth into the ground (at much reduced speed compared to Earth).

"Gas expelled from their bowels and stomachs caused simultaneous defecation, projectile vomiting and urination. They suffered massive seizures."

(https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/survival-in-space-unprotected-possible)

The stupidest human in the world (loose definition to that latter part) is retrieved by grappling lanyard, given oxygen at 1/10th Earth atm in the hopes of keeping them subdued, but not dead, which unfortunately is successful, even after deorbit jettison, reentry and headfirst landing in a Nevada desert right in front of a slow-scan TV crew (it's 969 after all), all because of that immensely thick skull. Massive lunar clean up costs trigger litigation which drags out for 1000 years due to space jurisdiction, and eventual release of the footage.

What we got instead was experimentation on animals.
SiliconWizard:
That's pretty funny. :-DD
aetherist:

--- Quote from: bsfeechannel on March 17, 2022, 01:38:41 am ---
--- Quote from: aetherist on March 16, 2022, 09:53:19 pm ---The modern peer review of the 1962 muon X criticized the calculation of the effect of the slowing & loss of energy of muons arising from the mass of the atmosphere tween the altitudes of the 2 tests
--- End quote ---
Peer review. What a cheeky devil. Scientists and pseudo-scientists are not peers.
--- End quote ---
Hence Einsteinists are not peers of neoLorentzists or of aetherists. It works both ways.
Or it works the same way if one accepts that it is the Einsteinists that are the pseudo-scientists.
Anyhow i hope that the modern muon Xs have sorted out errors re the calibration re the slowing of muons in air. It makes a difference to the exact form of the equation for gamma, ie it tells us whether Einstein's gamma for time dilation is ok for the decay of muons.
At the same time it tells us whether the neoLorentz gamma is ok (this is almost identical to Einstein's gamma).
I think that both are a little or a lot wrong.

I havent bothered to mention it until now, but Einstein's gamma is used more than once in the muon X.
It is i think used in the E=mcc used to calc the slowing of muons.
So, that makes the muon X a circular argument. Alltho the gamma is i admit used for a slightly different purpose (length contraction)(time dilation)(mass increase or decrease). But the equation has the same form in each purpose. And an error in logic in one purpose means an error in logic in every purpose.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod