General > General Technical Chat
Veritasium -- How Special Relativity Makes Magnets Work.
<< < (44/47) > >>
bsfeechannel:

--- Quote from: raptor1956 on April 18, 2022, 10:57:25 am ---How in hell did this thread reach 9 pages

--- End quote ---

Very simple. This aetherist guy is a retired civil engineer. He's not relevant for his field anymore. He obviously can't propose "alternative" theories there because he's not protected by ignorance. So he comes here, declares our theories as rubbish and then starts to present his ignorance as a "new" theory.

All to grab our attention and have someone to talk.

Keep entertaining him. He needs it.
aetherist:

--- Quote from: bsfeechannel on April 19, 2022, 12:01:55 pm ---
--- Quote from: raptor1956 on April 18, 2022, 10:57:25 am ---How in hell did this thread reach 9 pages
--- End quote ---
Very simple. This aetherist guy is a retired civil engineer. He's not relevant for his field anymore. He obviously can't propose "alternative" theories there because he's not protected by ignorance. So he comes here, declares our theories as rubbish and then starts to present his ignorance as a "new" theory.

All to grab our attention and have someone to talk.

Keep entertaining him. He needs it.
--- End quote ---
In early 2021 i became the No1 expert on the JFK accidental homicide.
Then i became the No1 expert on the chain fountain.
Then in late 2021 i became the No1 expert on the primary cause of electricity in a wire.
That’s three acts of genius in one year.
What have u dunn? ? ? ?
PlainName:
You're nothing if you aren't also No 1 expert on 9/11.
aetherist:
Yesterday i had a look at 5 or 6 youtubes by Christian Sutterlin on the channel called Jean de Climont.
Sutterlin says that magnetic fields are due to an electron's spin or spin precession or something, & that magnetic fields are not due to an electron's translation or motion (i don’t understand his theory)(i might have another look later).
Anyhow, i will make detailed comments on each of his youtubes later this week. Today i show links to 3 ovem below. He made 2 claims that especially caught my eye (i will comment on these later this week) …..
1. The magnetic field of an electron beam is cancelled when the beam deviates by 90 deg. He mentions an experiment using a 42mm glass tube with a 90deg bend, but this is confusing, i think that the laboratory never did complete that experiment, even tho Sutterlin mentions the experiment a number of times in a number of his youtubes.
2. When a current carrying long straight copper conductor is spun around its long axis the magnetic field increases by a factor of 5 for 100 rps or 10 for 260 rps. Here the magnetic field being measured is the standard field found around a stationary current carrying straight wire (it is not the axial field found in a coil)(he/they didn’t measure the axial field). He/they used a pulsed current (100 Hz i think), so that the detectors (2 coils) could get a reading.


The origin of magnetic fields. [31:34 long]  3,067 views.  Feb 3, 2018   Jean de Climont (Anglais)  873 subscribers 11 Comments.
Magnetic fields do not result from the movement of electrons, but from their intrinsic magnetic field. Moreover, the intrinsic magnetic field of the electrons does not have a dipole structure, but a rotational structure.



Rowland with a rotating conductor.  [3:24 long]  171 views.   Jan 14, 2022  Jean de Climont (Anglais)  873 subscribers
Rowland's experiment shows a magnetic field. The electrons in the electrically charged, high-speed spinning disk form circles. They form a kind of loop and therefore create a magnetic field in the axis of the disc. The disc can be replaced by a rotating conductive cylinder and the static electrons by an electric current. The magnetic field of the rotating conductor is about five times greater than the field of an identical current of 1 Amperes at 100 Hz through the motionless conductor.
2 Comments. Mathew Orman  2 months ago. The same experiment with compass near moving Van De Graaff generator charged belt show no magnetic filed... Draw your own conclusion..



The motion of electrons is not the cause of magnetic field. [14:05 long]   2,235 views.    Jan 18, 2020   Jean de Climont (Anglais)  873 subscribers.
The magnetic field of an electron beam is cancelled when the beam is deviated by 90°. This occurs in the Cyclotron. Scientists have long known that the electron, proton or ion beam of cyclotrons do not have any magnetic field although they travel at speeds of tens of thousands of kilometre per second. It is therefore that the magnetic field can not result from the motion of electrons.
EEVblog:

--- Quote from: hamster_nz on April 18, 2022, 10:14:44 pm ---I too initially shared your frustration, but it seems to quickly morphs into an exercise in critical thinking. My current bit of critical thinking is wondering if Aetherist is some sort of AI-powered bot sent to troll us.
Given the word salad of some of their posts, but also appears to be very well read and able to put some research in context, and the endless patience in face of overwhelming inconsistencies in their position.
If I had to call odds on a bet that they are a bot, I'm currently at 10:1 (ie most likely not a bot, but still a better than outside chance...).
--- End quote ---

It cannot be ruled out to be a sentient evolved version of the Rod Speed bot.
For those unaware, Rod Speed was (still is?) an infamous prolific aussie Usenet user who posted for decades in various electronics and political channels, and was so preditable in his replies that someone wrote a bot to simulate him. You could hardly tell the difference.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod