General > General Technical Chat
What calculator do you use ?
<< < (51/84) > >>
quarks:

--- Quote from: firewalker on November 11, 2012, 08:07:43 pm ---Just saw it.



--- End quote ---

That is great, thanks a lot for showing. I almost forgot about this one. Many years ago I had a colleague who really did his university with this mechanical wonder (he earned his master degree as a "watch maker" at university Geneva). When I first had it in my own hands I was blown away and tried to buy it from him. But of course I had no chance to get it.

In my very early days I had to work with this
chrome:

--- Quote from: jabramo on November 11, 2012, 10:32:38 pm ---Excel is a pain to do simple calculator math since you have to wait for the program to launch and then set up your function, where a calculator is usually at hand. But I do agree that it is a powerful tool especially when working with large data sets. I also agree that there are more advanced math programs and those programs will take even longer to set up. So I think you should use the simplest tool possible for the given problem because it will be most efficient.

--- End quote ---

Excel cold-boots under 2sec on my computer and a warm-start in under .5sec.

I can input much faster on my computer than on my TI-84+.

And I wouldn't use excel for stuff like 1+2 more like actual formula's.

If I'm at a computer without excel then i just use Wolfram alpha.
ErikTheNorwegian:

--- Quote from: chrome on November 12, 2012, 09:36:12 am ---
--- Quote from: jabramo on November 11, 2012, 10:32:38 pm ---Excel is a pain to do simple calculator math since you have to wait for the program to launch and then set up your function, where a calculator is usually at hand. But I do agree that it is a powerful tool especially when working with large data sets. I also agree that there are more advanced math programs and those programs will take even longer to set up. So I think you should use the simplest tool possible for the given problem because it will be most efficient.

--- End quote ---

Excel cold-boots under 2sec on my computer and a warm-start in under .5sec.

I can input much faster on my computer than on my TI-84+.

And I wouldn't use excel for stuff like 1+2 more like actual formula's.

If I'm at a computer without excel then i just use Wolfram alpha.

--- End quote ---

I did put all my formulas and calculations, and tables i need into my TI-nspire..
its  a Ti-84+ plus Excel and PC in one tool..  I do all the formulas finshed and load them from the PC into the TI-nspire and everything is a snap from there on to use. saves both time and the hazel of repeating the same keystrokes time after time.

PA4TIM:
I use the spreadsheet open-office. It is handy when having lots of data. But i use my calculators most often in my lab ( and most times I have no computer powered on there) or while designing and that I do while lying down without a computer, i draw schematics often on paper. ( i'm a bit disabled and can not sit very long)  so a programmable calculator is more easy for me. Upto now the HP-48GX app is becoming my favorite. I wanted to buy a HP50 but i read here  that it is not as good as the 48 and they changed several things again , not handy because  I'm just starting to know the 48.
I looked for used one, but they seem to cost even more as a new HP50, so it looks like the ipad app will stay my only HP48GX or maybe I better buy a HP50GX
Things I miss is the pi , lastx and x<>y button. I use those a lot. But i still have the 35's for the normal calculating jobs so not a real problem. What I like about the 50 is the size, huge screen and looks/layout. The 48 is ugly and so much knobs and text on it that I'm allways searching.

That is the thing I do not like from HP. On every calculator layout it complete different. Like pi is a yellow function on the 35s, a main buton on the 35, a blue function on the 15C and a softkey in a submenu on the 48, a yellow shift on the 42S ect. And brsides that every time above or under a different main key. ( like above Rdown on the 42S and above cos but under Rdown on the 35s)

Besides that, a spreadsheet does not have a solver. For instance my hp-48GX app has one formula for the thompson resonance formula. And using the solver i can get frequency, L or C. In a spreadsheet I need 3 formulas for that.


That Ti enspire is a very nice looking calculator with nice options but I thing to complex for me. I never had TI and I like the way HP works. So I stick to HP
ErikTheNorwegian:
I can certainly agree to that, the calculator is like the IT infrastructure in a company, it got to mirror the true use and needs of the users.  :)

TI nspire is not that difficult to learn, its mostly  made as like as windows as possible. Its like a good book, you cant put it down when you got it i had it with me all the time the first month i had it, everywhere. So much to explore and the  possibilities it has  is so good. Cant live without it!
One things with it , on the CAS model is  you have "what if" possibilities, gives a hole new dimension on problem solving in math, make a handle for a value and drag it with the mouse and everything in the calculation/tabels/curves/spreadsheets changes accordingly! Cant say how much that mean to me, but its so great!

So  it cover my needs..


Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod