Author Topic: what if apple had actually went bankruptcy in 1997,what would be different today  (Read 4225 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline aqarwaenTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 83
  • Country: us
so i was reading that article..what kind would would be world today,if Microsoft had decided do not help and instead enjoy watching apple going bankruptcy.

www.cnbc.com/amp/2017/08/29/steve-jobs-and-bill-gates-what-happened-when-microsoft-saved-apple.html
« Last Edit: August 16, 2020, 07:01:56 pm by aqarwaen »
 

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13156
  • Country: ch
That $150M investment was a symbolic gesture that made no difference to Apple’s actual survival, since Apple’s financial situation wasn’t actually that dire. The part of the agreement that was crucial was Microsoft’s promise to continue making Office for Mac for 5 years.
 

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13156
  • Country: ch
Probably divorces and suicides would have gone up significantly from having to put up with Windows operative systems only.
:P
Man, I would have hated having to switch to windows, especially back then. I still prefer Mac, but the windows of today is far more tolerable.

Other than that, Bill Gates wet dream would still be the forced vaccination of everyone
Yes, the terrible ambition of wanting to eliminate diseases that kill or maim millions each year. The gall!  ::)
 
The following users thanked this post: daqq, Teti

Offline Benta

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6420
  • Country: de
Nothing good can come out of actions that are ‘forced’ and ‘for everyone’. History has some examples about that

Do you mean M$ Windows? Then I agree.

 

Online NiHaoMike

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9319
  • Country: us
  • "Don't turn it on - Take it apart!"
    • Facebook Page
I read that if a vaccine causes problems, you can't sue the manufacturer. Not sure how true that is but if it is, it should be changed so that the anti vaxers would have one less argument against vaccines.
Probably divorces and suicides would have gone up significantly from having to put up with Windows operative systems only.
Linux started to become usable for everyday use not too long after that time. It just didn't catch on since Windows 2000 and Windows XP were pretty decent.
Cryptocurrency has taught me to love math and at the same time be baffled by it.

Cryptocurrency lesson 0: Altcoins and Bitcoin are not the same thing.
 

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Apologies for derailing this thread though, it's a bad habit of mine.

It's hard to speculate what would have happened if Apple had gone bankrupt. Maybe NeXT would have caught on? Or BeOS? It's possible Linux would have filled some of that gap, or maybe somebody would have actually succeeded in resurrecting Amiga. With mature computing platforms there seems to be room for about 2 major platforms in the market. I'd hate to have only one choice regardless of how good it is
 

Offline Bud

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7276
  • Country: ca
We would still have physical newspapers to read today.
Facebook-free life and Rigol-free shack.
 

Online magic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7453
  • Country: pl
Quote
what if apple had actually went bankruptcy in 1997,what would be different today
No iPhone.
No "posted with tapatalk" bullshit.
No 4k photographs of scope screens.
People too dumb to reinstall Windows every month out of the Internet.
8)

That really depends on what is being required. Schooling and vaccines absolutely benefit mankind, society, and the individual alike.
Except societies subjected to these experiments exhibit extinction behavior and record rates of autism.
:-DD
 

Offline Black Phoenix

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1137
  • Country: hk
Another one to the list of locked threads right?

With the upmost respect is this thread about what would Apple be if Microsoft didn't help or is another one that starts on topic, derails into politics and how bad your country compared with mine and social differences that is going to be locked because it derail into offtopic?
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki

Online NiHaoMike

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9319
  • Country: us
  • "Don't turn it on - Take it apart!"
    • Facebook Page
No iPhone.
The very first iPhone was made by Infogear.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2020, 05:38:21 am by EEVblog »
Cryptocurrency has taught me to love math and at the same time be baffled by it.

Cryptocurrency lesson 0: Altcoins and Bitcoin are not the same thing.
 

Offline GeorgeOfTheJungle

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • !
  • Posts: 2699
  • Country: tr
Quote
what if apple had actually went bankruptcy in 1997

The Teslas would have real gauges and buttons instead of that silly iPad :-)
The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.
 

Offline olkipukki

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 790
  • Country: 00
,if Microsoft had decided do not help and instead enjoy watching apple going bankruptcy.


By end of 1998, Microsoft splitted (aka antitrust case) into 2 companies Micro- and Soft-.

Micro- went to buy Texas Instruments and Soft- has implemented hard-time DOS for MSP430.
After Micro- acquired ARM for a peanuts, the company renamed into Microarm.
In 2000, new hard-time BASIC born to run on 64kB MSP430+ MCU.
Twenty years later (2020) everybody forgot what C is all about. BASIC became a ruler of the embedded world.

Soft- eventuality bought by IBM, and WINDOWS been disassembled into FRAMES, GLASS and SCREWS.

<EOF>  :horse:
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 39025
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Apologies for derailing this thread though, it's a bad habit of mine.

WTF people, just stop it. How hard is it to stay on topic for HALF A PAGE before turning a thread about Apple into a vaccination debate. Seriously, just stop it.
I have deleted all the off-topic posts.
Just ignore people like Tooki who deliberately start this sort of thing. It could have died right there if no one took the bait and replied.
There is too much of this crap on the forum as of late, and I don't want to have to start locking threads, warning or banning people, or deleting posts.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2020, 05:39:12 am by EEVblog »
 
The following users thanked this post: 2N3055

Offline peter-h

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4355
  • Country: gb
  • Doing electronics since the 1960s...
Computers are just tools for doing work.

If Apple did not exist, or disappeared at some point, nothing much would actually change. Windows works fine but it is just an OS. What matters is the application software. Going back say 15-20 years it was true that most graphics design software was available for Apple only, and this produced a "graphic designer = always Apple" fashion culture, but that changed a long time ago.

The world would carry on just fine without Apple.

The whole Iphone fashion is just a fashion. It doesn't do more than an Android phone. And in the end a smartphone is just a thing for making calls, messaging, and running applications.

Re off topic stuff, I run a forum also in my spare time (not in electronics) and we have had the same there. There are lots of people who are basically frustrated with life and are looking for outlets for mischief. It makes a mod's job harder.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2020, 09:03:14 am by peter-h »
Z80 Z180 Z280 Z8 S8 8031 8051 H8/300 H8/500 80x86 90S1200 32F417
 

Offline Cerebus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10576
  • Country: gb
Computers are just tools for doing work.

If Apple did not exist, or disappeared at some point, nothing much would actually change. Windows works fine but it is just an OS. What matters is the application software. Going back say 15-20 years it was true that most graphics design software was available for Apple only, and this produced a "graphic designer = always Apple" fashion culture, but that changed a long time ago.

The world would carry on just fine without Apple.

The whole Iphone fashion is just a fashion. It doesn't do more than an Android phone. And in the end a smartphone is just a thing for making calls, messaging, and running applications.

Apple were first, by over a year, Android was a "me too" product. It took Apple to get the Smartphone into existence. There had been PDAs before, there had been cellular connected PDAs (including Psion, Palm and Newton), there had even been mobile phones built around the whole idea of digital connectivity (Nokia 9000) but none of them got the formula quite right until the iPhone. Every smartphone since has essentially copied it. It may seem obvious now, but many innovative products seem obvious once someone has made the first one. There is no guarantee that someone else would have come up with a design that hit that sweet spot had Apple not have been there to do it.
Anybody got a syringe I can use to squeeze the magic smoke back into this?
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki

Offline peter-h

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4355
  • Country: gb
  • Doing electronics since the 1960s...
Of course we cannot prove this one way or another but Steve Jobs was not the only visionary around.

He had the idea of putting a phone in the Ipod (the then music player). That was a fairly obvious step, made possibly only around that time by technology. I am sure it would have happened.

Generally stuff that is (a) obvious and (b) possible gets done pretty quickly.
Z80 Z180 Z280 Z8 S8 8031 8051 H8/300 H8/500 80x86 90S1200 32F417
 
The following users thanked this post: newbrain

Offline Benta

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6420
  • Country: de

WTF people, just stop it. How hard is it to stay on topic for HALF A PAGE before turning a thread about Apple into a vaccination debate.

You missed the initiator: Reply#2.

Thanks for banging on the table.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2020, 11:02:57 pm by Benta »
 

Offline leham

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 94
no pixar maybe
 

Offline westfw

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4349
  • Country: us
Quote
If Apple did not exist, or disappeared at some point, nothing much would actually change.
I don't know.  The Apple/Microsoft Rivalry was probably one of the best things to ever happen to computer users.  It probably didn't hurt anyone that they both wrote such showy, hurried and inefficient software that it pushed chip manufacturers as well.
Perhaps, without Apple, it would have been Xerox, Next, or even Sun, that filled in the gap and pushed GUIs along.  Trickling down from commercial workstations to home users.  Eventually.

 

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13156
  • Country: ch
Apologies for derailing this thread though, it's a bad habit of mine.

WTF people, just stop it. How hard is it to stay on topic for HALF A PAGE before turning a thread about Apple into a vaccination debate. Seriously, just stop it.
I have deleted all the off-topic posts.
Just ignore people like Tooki who deliberately start this sort of thing. It could have died right there if no one took the bait and replied.
There is too much of this crap on the forum as of late, and I don't want to have to start locking threads, warning or banning people, or deleting posts.

What are you talking about? I didn’t deliberately start anything. (If I ever do start something, it’s NOT deliberate.) I’m not the one who brought up vaccination. Please point your vitriol at the person who actually injected the off topic BS.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2020, 03:24:40 pm by tooki »
 

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13156
  • Country: ch
Computers are just tools for doing work.

If Apple did not exist, or disappeared at some point, nothing much would actually change. Windows works fine but it is just an OS. What matters is the application software. Going back say 15-20 years it was true that most graphics design software was available for Apple only, and this produced a "graphic designer = always Apple" fashion culture, but that changed a long time ago.

The world would carry on just fine without Apple.

The whole Iphone fashion is just a fashion. It doesn't do more than an Android phone. And in the end a smartphone is just a thing for making calls, messaging, and running applications.
The thing about Apple is that it established many of the user interface conventions we now take for granted. For example, Apple didn’t invent the mouse or the GUI as such, but the earlier GUIs (like the Xerox Alto and Star) used the mouse in fundamentally different ways than we do now — every GUI on the market now essentially uses the Apple conventions for fundamental interaction. Apple set the standard for mouse GUIs, and then they set the standard for touch GUIs.

I mean, nothing in the original iPhone hardware was custom. It was essentially state of the art, but off the shelf, hardware brought together by radically innovative software. The iPhone’s multitouch interaction model pretty much instantly obsoleted every other touch GUI model.

So while it’s certain that we would have eventually gotten a better smartphone than what existed pre-iPhone, it’s not likely to have resembled what we think of as smartphones today.

Apple has a unique knack for really understanding how to put technology to use. (They cultivate that skill internally, but also readily acquire it when they spot it elsewhere, hence hiring talented designers like Mike Matas, buying up companies with promising hardware, etc.) This is in no way to say that nobody else has any talent in this, that’s absolutely not the case. But Apple does have an unusually high share.
 

Offline Sal Ammoniac

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1764
  • Country: us
Apple didn’t invent the mouse or the GUI as such, but the earlier GUIs (like the Xerox Alto and Star) used the mouse in fundamentally different ways than we do now — every GUI on the market now essentially uses the Apple conventions for fundamental interaction.

Some Apple conventions, fortunately, have been tossed on the dustbin of history, such as single button mice.
"That's not even wrong" -- Wolfgang Pauli
 
The following users thanked this post: newbrain

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13156
  • Country: ch
Apple didn’t invent the mouse or the GUI as such, but the earlier GUIs (like the Xerox Alto and Star) used the mouse in fundamentally different ways than we do now — every GUI on the market now essentially uses the Apple conventions for fundamental interaction.

Some Apple conventions, fortunately, have been tossed on the dustbin of history, such as single button mice.
Yes and no. There’s a really sound reason behind that*, which is why Apple’s mouse and trackpad buttons still default to single-button, though they can be configured to two button, with full software support.

*to avoid the problem that befell Windows and many *NIXen: many developers putting essential application functionality only within the context menus. By telling devs “go ahead and create context menus, but assume your users may not have access to that, so make sure the commands are all housed properly in the menu bar, too”, they ensured this won’t happen. (But don’t get me started on Apple’s Ive-era descent into command hide-and-seek with so much hidden under hover events and gestures. Completely antithetical to much of their earlier user interface guidelines....)
 

Offline Sal Ammoniac

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1764
  • Country: us
Man, I would have hated having to switch to windows, especially back then. I still prefer Mac, but the windows of today is far more tolerable.

Back then MS had Windows NT, which was a much better OS than Mac OS of the time. Remember, OSX didn't come out until several years later and the old Mac OS was a cooperative-multitasking OS with no memory protection or separation where you had to explicitly allocate memory to each application. Reboots were de rigueur several times a day. I remember those days well and I think many remember Mac OS as a better OS than it actually was.

I'll agree that Mac OS was generally better than the consumer versions of Windows (Windows 95, 98, and ME), but it was not as good as NT.
"That's not even wrong" -- Wolfgang Pauli
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki, newbrain

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13156
  • Country: ch
Man, I would have hated having to switch to windows, especially back then. I still prefer Mac, but the windows of today is far more tolerable.

Back then MS had Windows NT, which was a much better OS than Mac OS of the time. Remember, OSX didn't come out until several years later and the old Mac OS was a cooperative-multitasking OS with no memory protection or separation where you had to explicitly allocate memory to each application. Reboots were de rigueur several times a day. I remember those days well and I think many remember Mac OS as a better OS than it actually was.

I'll agree that Mac OS was generally better than the consumer versions of Windows (Windows 95, 98, and ME), but it was not as good as NT.
Well there are two layers to the issue, really: the user interface and the software architecture. From a UI standpoint, I’ve always preferred Mac to Windows. NT and the DOS-based Windows shared the same UI I didn’t like. That alone was enough to keep me off Windows.

From an architecture standpoint, there’s absolutely no question that among classic Mac OS, DOS-based Windows, and Windows NT, it was Windows NT that had the best architecture. By a wide margin. Had NT not had to support the myriad hardware configurations possible in the windows world, it would likely have avoided most of the (comparatively few) crashes it did have.

I still remember classic Mac OS fondly, as there are still some aspects of its UI that I consider to be better thought-out than in any OS before or since, including today’s macOS. As for stability... I mean, I was able to get it to work pretty well. But other than in carefully curated server configurations, it was categorically impossible to achieve truly long uptimes with it. Certainly not multiple crashes per day if configured decently, but not the weeks or months of uptime easily achieved with Mac OS X or NT. I routinely kept it up for perhaps a week at a time, using sleep instead of shutdown.

But allocating memory manually, and having to configure system extensions to load in the right order to get them to play nice... that I don’t miss at all!!! (I used to do that for a living, in fact: I worked as an on-site Mac consultant back in 2001-02, and did it a little bit on the side for a few years after that.)

DOS-based Windows was much like classic Mac OS in that a carefully tuned system could work well, but any misbehaving program could freeze it up.


Oh yeah, one thing I can say with confidence after working as a Mac tech during the classic Mac OS era: the choice of hardware made a huge difference in stability. While pretty much everything from the Power Mac G3 (mid 1997) on was stable if configured halfway decently, man were there differences before. Some architectures, like the 75/85/9500 series, were great. Others, like the 52/6200 series, were awful. I was not impressed by the stability of any PPC603/603e system Apple ever made. I suspect part of it may have been that the low end systems in the early-mid 90s used IDE instead of SCSI, and at the time, Apple was far, far more experienced with SCSI at that time. By the late 90s Apple had figured out IDE properly and was able to use it on pro hardware, too.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf