| General > General Technical Chat |
| What if someone is WRONG on this forum? |
| << < (25/27) > >> |
| RJSV:
Well, it happened; (I just wasn't expecting a quick go, with someone questioning my politics, after I'd posted...here!). Amazing. By way of a couple of PM,s someone here wanted to delve 'into my politics', (although I partially was to blame, for posting regarding fears of being labeled or mis-labled). Lol, let em speculate. (For more on that, please refer back to yesterday in this thread, regarding speculation of some 'bad' vaccination reaction...causing folks to speculate off the deep end. Now, I'm not going into detail, that political stuff isn't supposed to be posted, let's just say that a candidate, 'John Smith' has been associated with being 'anti-vaxer', and I felt intimidated in even mentioning (vaccinations). So, it happen, here, as I got the immediate question posed..."Was I a 'John Smith' supporter, wishing to create a 'Monarchy', somehow by way of a vaccination science comment ?" Ridiculous, but that makes my point right here! But also, I now realize that the PM messages can be an avenue for those wishing to bypass the forum standards. Not good. Otherwise, some of my responses, would have needed to delve into actual wartime (current events) and THAT has no place here. I'm learning. A SORE ARM does not = Monarchy advocation Thank you (Spork) |
| T3sl4co1l:
--- Quote from: spork on December 30, 2023, 12:07:02 am --- --- Quote from: RJSV on December 29, 2023, 11:29:05 pm ---I partially was to blame, for posting regarding fears of being labeled or mis-labled). Lol, let em speculate. --- End quote --- I told you in the PM that I wasn't there to judge you or out you - and I didn't. So I can't see what your problem is. --- Quote ---So, it happen, here, as I got the immediate question posed..."Was I a 'John Smith' supporter, wishing to create a 'Monarchy', somehow by way of a vaccination science comment ?" Ridiculous, but that makes my point right here! --- End quote --- I don't see how it makes your point. I asked you straight up. You didn't answer. But you didn't say "I'd rather not answer". In fact it seemed you invited me to get into a much deeper conversation with you on the topic. I'll be happy to post the exchange if there's some doubt about that. Because you failed to answer, I asked again on our next exchange. You confirmed my suspicion. So if your point is that not all people with vax concerns are Trumpers (and I know that not all are), this sure as hell didn't prove your point. --- Quote ---But also, I now realize that the PM messages can be an avenue for those wishing to bypass the forum standards. Not good. --- End quote --- Perhaps I'm not familiar with the "forum standards" you're speaking of. I thought it best not to start a whole new tangent based on your delusional take on the vaccine. And I thought you'd be more comfortable discussing it via PM. Seems I was right. If the object was to keep your MAGA status a secret so that people might take you seriously about anything, ever... why the hell would you post this!? --- Quote ---A SORE ARM does not = Monarchy advocation --- End quote --- Although it clearly does in your case. --- Quote ---Thank you (Spork) --- End quote --- De nada! --- End quote --- Can you, kindly, fuck off? Some people do, in fact, have adverse reactions, and being concerned about it is absolutely valid. I didn't gather the impression that RJSV was "Just Asking Questions" (I don't have a specific cite cutting to the nature of this rhetorical practice, but any of this playlist illustrates the general strategies ably [1] ), and indeed the point was that, because It'S BeEn PoLitICiZeD, one cannot even raise that valid and necessary concern; thus it's a "I would like to talk about X but not in the way that everyone now thinks being concerned about X means denying X". Which, is the form of that post, and which, because of exactly this rhetorical environment, has now been pushed to the only reasonable way to talk about it. And you still missed it. Another case in point: it's impossible to discuss Palestine, because any simple statement, for or against either party, has been co-opted into a reductio ad absurdum accusing one of supporting the other's massacres, whether directly, or by way of saying of course they can defend themselves (conveniently ignoring the "don't start nothin', won't be nothin'" of the actual situation). One must make ones' nuance on the situation clear as a predicate to further conversation, which, you will notice, makes the whole process much more annoying to engage in -- and thus speech is chilled. Tim [1] Because I can't hyperlink anything on YT, enjoy the embed: |
| coromonadalix:
--- Quote from: bdunham7 on December 29, 2023, 03:10:11 pm --- --- Quote from: tggzzz on December 29, 2023, 11:33:25 am ---I hadn't spotted this thread, but I like seeing that the mods have locked it https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/isolation-of-the-oscilloscope-from-the-mains-with-two-transformers/msg5244183/#msg5244183 --- End quote --- I was annoyed with the OP and done with the thread after his response to my query about fuses, but I really don't see why the thread needed locking. Thread locks and bans are certainly necessary at times when they drift off course, but this one had merely drifted into a conversation regarding the details of his control circuit. Perhaps there is more to the story. --- End quote --- now back with a 3rd thread loll this is a WRONG electrodacus this is a WRONG and sadly in 2023 the eevblog forum is being abused and pushed into corners until Dave or some strong mods intervene .... when a thread is now at least 2 pages long or over 2 pages and nothing is clear, it is obvioulsy WRONG |
| thm_w:
anddddddd thread locked due to personal attacks and politics. Just like clockwork. |
| .RC.:
--- Quote from: T3sl4co1l on December 30, 2023, 01:04:31 am --- [1] Because I can't hyperlink anything on YT, enjoy the embed: --- End quote --- I lasted ten seconds on that video. I have come to the conclusion that most people do not have the faintest idea of what left and right is. And I include myself in that group. I look at the USSR and they were, pro industry, pro nuclear, pro agriculture, pro war, pro pretty much everything except individual freedoms. And they are apparently left. Then I look at the USA. At the same time period they were. pro nuclear, pro industry, in fact pro everything the USSR was except they were mostly pro freedoms, but people were not all free. And they were apparently right. These days it all is highly confused. Today by many self proclaimed left wingers the USSR would be right wing because of all the pro nuclear and pro industry and pro agriculture etc ideals. But right wingers are all for controlling people. We have big businesses supposedly should be right wing by old standards, that are more and more wanting to remove individual freedoms and curtail things. We have "right wingers" wanting this that or the other done. Hell today you could even argue Nazi Germany was left wing the way they were socialist in nature. So when people go on about alt right or trumpies, or leninists or socialists or capitalists or whatever. I think the vast majority of them have no freaking idea what category they are trying to lump groups into. I think that people will convince themselves that they are right and want to make sure others only do what they want them to do. It is an eternal battle that will be forever ongoing. However I do feel the world will fracture at a point and it seems to be getting closer. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |