General > General Technical Chat
What's the minimum (physics first) to get an oscillator?
<< < (17/17)
AK6DN:
Two requirements for an oscillator:
1) a feedback loop
2) gain greater than unity
TimFox:

--- Quote from: AK6DN on June 04, 2023, 05:54:24 pm ---Two requirements for an oscillator:
1) a feedback loop
2) gain greater than unity

--- End quote ---

The title of this post is "what's the minimum (physics first) to get an oscillator?" (emphasis supplied)
As I keep pointing out, in physics an "oscillator" does not have to produce a sustained output, as does a feedback oscillator in engineering.
Even in engineering, there are non-feedback oscillators (such as negative-resistance or relaxation oscillators).
metebalci:

--- Quote from: aneevuser on June 03, 2023, 12:54:54 pm ---
--- Quote from: IanB on May 23, 2023, 01:39:00 pm ---From a mathematical and physics point of view, you need to have a second order time derivative in the differential equation that describes the system. This is the only way the solution will include a complex exponential which will involve functions of sin() and cos().

--- End quote ---
Interesting thread.

The quote above is too restrictive though. There are higher order DEs which can be proven to oscillate, though I'm not at all familiar with the methods (and as you note later, coupled first order DEs like Lotka-Volterra can also oscillate - do we count them as "really" second order?) - there is a branch of DE maths called oscillation theory which treats these problems.

--- End quote ---

Lotka-Volterra is second order, isnt it ? Why "really" ? There is a pair of first order equations.

I think an oscillation can happen in one dimensional discrete systems but for a continuous one two dimensions are needed (not possible to have two unstable points next to each in one dimension I think?)
Navigation
Message Index
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod