General > General Technical Chat
Why does OpenAI ChatGPT, Possibly Want to disagree/annoy and change my eating...
MK14:
--- Quote from: tom66 on December 31, 2022, 12:25:10 am ---It's really, really bad at math.
https://sharegpt.com/c/uhTrcAx
--- Quote ---In the first equation, 3x + 4y = 3(12) + 4(4) = 36 + 16 = 52, which does not equal 24. However, in the second equation, 3x + 4y = 3(12) + 4(4) = 36 + 16 = 52, which does equal 24. Therefore, the values x = 12 and y = 4 do satisfy the simultaneous equations.
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
I'm still impressed with its maths capabilities, from a fun and advancement of computer AI mathematics point of view. It does seem to be getting there, albeit slowly (maybe it needs more decades of research and computer power, rather than months or years).
But I just played around with your question, and modifications of it, myself. It does indeed mess up, fairly (or even very) badly.
It is a bit like the sort of results, I would expect to see, from a (age estimates and opinions of the age, can vary widely), primary school pupil. Who has NOT been especially well taught and/or is not especially good (a natural), at mathematics.
On the one hand you are right, it is indeed bad. But on the other, I'm amazed at how much progress there has been in AI, over a number of decades.
I.e. If it can imitate primary school level (maths etc), thinking, today. What age and abilities, will these AI systems, be able to achieve in perhaps 10, 20 or 30 years?
When/if they reach Maths University Professor/researcher capabilities, and can be left churning away at improving/inventing/checking new maths concepts, at a speed (I suspect), perhaps thousands of times faster than a person can process those maths inventions/thoughts/ideas/stuff. We could be in for a massive technological revolution.
A bit like the dawn of a new iron age, steel age, steam age, electronics (Valves/tubes, transistors, integrated circuits, Microprocessors, Internet), AI (whatever it ends up being called) age.
On the other hand, there were some amazing technologies, a number of decades ago. Some of which haven't necessarily produced great results, even now. So, I suppose it is early days, to get too excited about AI. But it does look very promising.
RJSV:
I was hoping to use that Chat-Bot, on my current headache...,err: my wanna be supercompu.
.phew, (name changed to disguise project):
1.) Using shift bits function.
Define: ShiftRt = #parameter1 >>
// example: #parameter = #parameter - 0.01
Required: RightPack(parameter1)
// example: Col0 = Col1, Col1= Col2, Col2= Col3,
// Col3 = Col4, Col4 = Col5
etc.
(Edit: Mk14: Can I say that ? "etc." or 'require' ?
TEST = Summation(parameter1)
// Col9+Col8+Col7+Col6+Col5+Col4+Col3+Col2+Col1+
Col0
//
Print ("Test = " parameter1 )
Edit:. Heck, I can butcher code faster than that thing, (can even imagine).
MK14:
This is its reply, to your last post:
--- Quote ---It looks like you are trying to write a function that will shift the elements of an array or list to the right by one index and assign the value of the first element to the last element. Here is an example of how you can implement this using a list in Python:
def shift_right(lst):
last_element = lst[-1]
for i in range(len(lst)-1, 0, -1):
lst = lst[i-1]
lst[0] = last_element
# Test the function
lst = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
shift_right(lst)
print(lst) # Output: [5, 1, 2, 3, 4]
This function works by first saving the last element of the list in a variable called last_element. Then, it iterates over the list in reverse and shifts each element to the right by one index by assigning the value of the previous element to it. Finally, it assigns the value of last_element to the first element of the list.
I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions or if you need further clarification.
--- End quote ---
gubezon:
Ok I was all excited to have a go at this, after my years ago fun with Eliza/perl, but in order to play, they want a working mobile number to send verification SMS to?
Total buzzkill.
(Sorry if this has been covered elsewhere. I am not trying to sound unreasonable and whiney, it's just a momentary knee-jerk irritation. I'll find a way...)
MK14:
--- Quote from: gubezon on December 31, 2022, 02:21:29 am ---Ok I was all excited to have a go at this, after my years ago fun with Eliza/perl, but in order to play, they want a working mobile number to send verification SMS to?
Total buzzkill.
(Sorry if this has been covered elsewhere. I am not trying to sound unreasonable and whiney, it's just a momentary knee-jerk irritation. I'll find a way...)
--- End quote ---
I think there are a number of reasons, why they do that (needing significantly identifiable information, from people using their services). One is they seem to limit the traffic/load levels. If people could create lots of accounts, they could bypass those limits, by switching to various alternative accounts.
Also, those limits are important to them. Because they have paid plans, to over-come some of the limitations. But if people could register, multiple accounts, they could get something similar to paid for plans, for free.
I think there are many other reasons, why they do it.
Maybe in the future, their capabilities at detecting multiple-accounts, will improve enough, so they don't need to resort to such tactics. I.e. They can supply free trials, without needing excessive registration information.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version