that's not a landing that is an aborted takeoff
Yeah, and a nominal V1 (maximum speed at which a start can be aborted) is around 160 knots while a landing with MTOW will get you in the same range (usual landing speeds are in the 130-150 knots range)... So the only main difference is that the tires never left the ground for the aborted takeoff, but other than that a fast landing produces a similar strain on the aircraft than an aborted takeoff.
at an aborted takeoff there probably much less runway left to stop on, braking is much much harder
afaik thrust reversers are not even on the minium equipment list
Original video looks like flight trials. The rejected takeoff test has to be V1, maximum takeoff weight, no thrust reversers, the plane must stop on the runway and be able to exit the runway. Meaning it must be able to put the brake fire out and taxi under it's own power off the runway. Often when a rejected takeoff happens the brakes can go on fire and lock up, closing the runway until engineers can unlock the wheels.
No thrust reverses is because rejected takeoffs very often happen when there is an engine failure and you can't really use thrust reverses without symetric thrust.
Thrust reversers are usually banned at airports for out of schedule movements... ie. out of hours, like at night when there are stricter noise abatement requirements.
On gliding an airliner (or anything for that matter) it's all about the number 1 gauge, speed. Fly the pitch/aoa to maintain the speed you need and take whatever descent rate you get. It's a recurring problem that airline pilots are so heavily trained in procedures, checklists and "flying the numbers" that they simply forget to "fly the damn plane".