@m3vuv you landed on the watch list because of your arrogant and insulting behaviour. I have tried very hard to work with you to get you to see how your behaviour is not acceptable.
As someone with their own communications problems (abrasiveness, excess verbosity), I can place myself in m3vuv's proverbial shoes. I know that at some point, those problems may make me unwelcome, too. However, I know that that would not be due to my person or my personality, but by my communications. (I did have to start using a pseudonym, Nominal Animal, instead of my real name online, to truly "grok" this, though.)
I only hope that before that happens, I will be notified of being close to the line by the moderators or Dave. (Preferably via a private message describing exactly how, because a public post might trigger a premature emotional reaction (feeling being "publicly accosted"); whereas one can read and digest a private message in their own time, and cool down first.)
Putting myself in m3vuv's shoes, having taken a look at their last couple of hundred posts (and noting they have mentioned some personal hardship right now): if this was me, I'd have to conclude the ban is fair, for now. (I've had something like this happen to me years ago, when I was, uh, not in the best mental state possible, myself.)
Thing is, one must either adjust their communications style so that they contribute more to the discussion than their personal quirks hamper it. If that's not possible, then that's not the place for them. It's not good or bad, it's just how the world is; much like how one is not suitable for every possible job, only some of them.
Thus, in my opinion, the best possible outcome would be for m3vuv to work on changing their posting style for the better (seeing as they
are capable of it, at least have been, elsewhere, years ago), and consider it the "cost" of participating here. If they sort themselves out and decide they'd like to do that, they could contact Dave and set up a new account with some strict boundary conditions. I know for a fact that this has been done before, and it has worked out at least in a couple of cases. Not all, though, obviously; and I know of several who have left exactly because they just didn't feel they "fit".
The key is to realize that this is nothing personal; it is only about how we communicate with each other, and somewhat
necessary to stop the forum for falling into chaos. (And while one could argue philosophically about where that line should lie, just looking at the forum as it is right now, I at least must conclude Dave et al. do a better job at this than I could. I can comment on individual cases, but I definitely don't want to affect the "policy line" Dave sets.)