General > General Technical Chat
YouTube - At a lose where to go from here
SilverSolder:
I would just let it go, and stop using Youtube as far as practicable - a big, faceless corporation that treats you like dirt... what do you expect?
Build an electronic project instead, and make a video about that - you will be happier!
steviefaux:
--- Quote from: SilverSolder on September 24, 2020, 10:02:22 pm ---
I would just let it go, and stop using Youtube as far as practicable - a big, faceless corporation that treats you like dirt... what do you expect?
Build an electronic project instead, and make a video about that - you will be happier!
--- End quote ---
It just annoys me. Although YouTube is an annoyance its more the parking company I don't want to win.
YouTube is getting more and more annoying with their automated responses. Clearly no person has read the last e-mail and clearly they favour the person claiming the strike.
Thank you for your counter notification.
Based on the information you provided, it appears that you do not have the necessary rights to post the content on YouTube. Therefore, we regretfully cannot honor your request. It has not been forwarded to the original claimant, and we will not be able to restore your video.
To learn more about copyright, you may visit YouTube’s Copyright Center.
Keep in mind that copyright strikes expire after three months, as long as you’ve completed Copyright School.
We unfortunately are unable to assist further in this matter.
- The YouTube Team
Counter-Notification as follows:
Videos included in counter-notification:
VIDEO
Hi
I'm getting more confused with each Counter Notification rejection. You're not telling me why you're rejecting the Counter Notification. I've sent yet another one which has been rejected again but tells me what I need to include which I've done. Can someone please check this and explain what I'm missing if anything?
It is for this video
VIDEO
Thank you
Steve
PlainName:
Make a very short video highlighting what the problem is with big easily and quickly recognisable parts. Like their logo, a zoomed-in screenshot of cleartext data, etc. The post that on their twitter feed asking why they prefer to DMCA you than fix the problem. Ditto Facebook.
If that doesn't work you're looking at serious money to sue YouTube. The real threat of doing so - that is, a pukka letter before action - might achieve what you want, but you need to be able to back up your bluffs. Probably sensible to admit defeat before this point.
tom66:
Not using SSL is not, itself, a breach of GDPR.
GDPR relates to how you store and use data, not how that data reaches the intended destination. That said, if any of the data is of a significant personal nature, it's definitely a concerning lapse of judgement.
Cerebus:
--- Quote from: tom66 on September 25, 2020, 08:53:02 pm ---Not using SSL is not, itself, a breach of GDPR.
GDPR relates to how you store and use data, not how that data reaches the intended destination.
--- End quote ---
Article 5 of the GDPR requires that personal data shall be:
"(f) processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of the personal data, including protection against unauthorised or unlawful processing and against accidental loss, destruction or damage, using appropriate technical or organisational measures"
In this day and age that equates to being properly encrypted while being transmitted electronically as an "appropriate technical" measure. It may not be explicitly mandated, but is by implication.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version