| General > General Technical Chat |
| YouTube - At a lose where to go from here |
| << < (4/4) |
| steviefaux:
Yep, SSL for forms is a def must under GDPR otherwise you're sending over those personal details in plain text. I've had another idea. My channel isn't monitised so I lose no money and the one strike doesn't affect anything. I've reshot the video with commentary and reluctantly followed the "Copyright School" from YouTube which means the strike expires in December. That way, the fools don't get my real address (which I'm pretty sure they wanted to either use for online abuse or send goons round). So I'm writing up an article on the whole episode and will post it on my own website linking to the lbry video. I'll see if I can get Register to pick it up (I doubt they will). It's just annoying seeing how easily it is to abuse YouTube's copyright system and they favour the person making the claim to the person making a counter claim. The counter claim, despite being legit and the whole video being legally legit, they keep rejecting and not explaining why. I still find it amusing (I maybe the only one) that they've attempted to hide the fact their T&C was invalid when I made the video. On the T&C page they've placed a date before I uploaded my video. But, thankfully, TheWayBackMachine capture the same page a few months after they claim their policy was updated and the updates are there :) |
| SilverSolder:
You just have to understand how much money is being made from owning intellectual property. Then it becomes obvious why the system is so biased in favour of copyright owners... he who pays the piper etc. |
| steviefaux:
Its funny as their site is so poor but they have Copyright notices in their T&C. The only thing they can claim copyright on, is their REALLY poor logo which is used I believe once, on one page. Doing a reverse image search I've realised, which was somewhat obvious anyway, all other images on the site and stock ones used all over the place. |
| PlainName:
They can claim copyright on their T&C as laid out. Actually, they can claim copyright on anything they want, but it's actually applicable to their version of the T&C. It would be interesting if they'd nicked it (it's usually boilerplate) and tried to claim someone elses IPR as theirs... |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Previous page |