I'd love for The Register to take up the story but I e-mailed them and appear to have been ignored

What's more annoying is YouTube's counter notification system. Its a pain in the arse.
I've submitted 3 times now and all times they've rejected but don't explain what they want. The one but last rejection they gave me a link, I read it and included everything required. They then rejected again and again just gave me the same link but again aren't telling me what is wrong. Why are they rejecting it. The only thing I can think of is the house number. They have on the form "Street address" so I put the street but not the house number. The reason being, it's clear that the owner of said shading car company will most likely use the address to be abusive. I could give my previous address and claim, if they check I'm registered there, that I'm in the process of moving but then fear that will kill the counter notification if they realise I've used a false address.
This is what I've sent that was rejected
The video used in my content was used under Fair Dealing/Fair Use as this was for comment, critique and educational purposes. All relevant comment, critique and educational text can been read in the description with links to the original websites in said content.
The last rejection they gave me this link
https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/counter-notification-requirements.html this then redirects to
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6005919Which clearly shows they are pointing to old links.
It stated they need a link to the video but why? The counter notification is FROM the video so surely they have it already. I included it, they still rejected it.
I've now e-mailed copyright@youtube.com direct but am losing all hope because I get the impression a bot is the only thing reading that mailboxes e-mails also.
I just wish the Register would have replied and taken up the story.
I've reported the company to the ICO now but even they are useless. They expect you to contact the company first. I never did back in August 2019 because they never had an available e-mail address (they don't want people who get tickets e-mailing them direct). They've also amended the date on their T&C to make out it was last edited earlier in the year, which was when they had NO GPDR information at all, unfortunately I never took a screenshot at the time and the wayback machine didn't have it.......double check.....GREAT THEY DO!
I'd love for The Register to take up the story but I e-mailed them and appear to have been ignored

What's more annoying is YouTube's counter notification system. Its a pain in the arse.
I've submitted 3 times now and all times they've rejected but don't explain what they want. The one but last rejection they gave me a link, I read it and included everything required. They then rejected again and again just gave me the same link but again aren't telling me what is wrong. Why are they rejecting it. The only thing I can think of is the house number. They have on the form "Street address" so I put the street but not the house number. The reason being, it's clear that the owner of said shading car company will most likely use the address to be abusive. I could give my previous address and claim, if they check I'm registered there, that I'm in the process of moving but then fear that will kill the counter notification if they realise I've used a false address.
This is what I've sent that was rejected
The video used in my content was used under Fair Dealing/Fair Use as this was for comment, critique and educational purposes. All relevant comment, critique and educational text can been read in the description with links to the original websites in said content.
The last rejection they gave me this link
https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/counter-notification-requirements.html this then redirects to
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6005919Which clearly shows they are pointing to old links.
It stated they need a link to the video but why? The counter notification is FROM the video so surely they have it already. I included it, they still rejected it.
I've now e-mailed copyright@youtube.com direct but am losing all hope because I get the impression a bot is the only thing reading that mailboxes e-mails also.
I just wish the Register would have replied and taken up the story.
I've reported the company to the ICO now but even they are useless. They expect you to contact the company first. I never did back in August 2019 because they never had an available e-mail address (they don't want people who get tickets e-mailing them direct). They've also amended the date on their T&C to make out it was last edited earlier in the year, which was when they had NO GPDR information at all, unfortunately I never took a screenshot at the time and the wayback machine didn't have it.......double check.....GREAT THEY DO!
https://ibb.co/vx0XBWM