i dont have time entertaining nitpicks, you should know what i meant.
And that is at the root of the entire problem. Instead of constructing your argument logically, you spew something out, and expect readers/listeners/watchers
to know what you meant, instead of read/hear/see what you said. This is wrong.
about difficult to find usefull one, i guess its PEBCAK
No. I can read and integrate what I read quite fast, and I habitually watch Youtube at 1.25× or 1.5× speed, depending on how clear the accent is.
When you use the poor search engine Youtube implements nowadays –– it isn't precise at all, and prefers its own algorithms over exact word matches ––, after winnowing the search terms down, you typically get about a dozen results. If only one of these is useful –– and that is commonly the case, except when the same video has been reuploaded by many people in the hopes of monetizing others' work ––, statistically you end up watching the beginning or spots of at least half of the videos. This takes dozens of seconds per video.
I can read and understand and integrate the abstract of a peer-reviewed article in less than a minute, and estimate the usefulness of a "how-to" page or blog within seconds; let's say less than ten seconds per page.
"Difficult" here means "it takes more time than it needs to, and is thus wasteful and inefficient". Because I cannot implement my own Youtube search engine (their TOS forbids such, even if it were technically possible, which it isn't), I cannot affect the search situation at all. The increased amounts of garbage videos means the density of useful videos to garbage videos is steadily decreasing, and thus finding useful videos will require more and more effort, for a shrinking yield.
You know this is happening to yourself too, because when you look at Youtube search results, you will look at the author and view count of each suggested video, simply because most videos are not worth watching, even though Youtube claims they match your search results.
The solution to this problem is telling humans and authors how to do better. It is not being "the boss of them", it is the internet-age equivalent of not littering.