Author Topic: hmmm NASA spending logic ?  (Read 189 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 3roomlabTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 836
  • Country: 00
« Last Edit: July 22, 2024, 07:00:06 am by 3roomlab »
 

Offline 10maurycy10

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 3
  • Country: us
    • My  blog
Re: hmmm NASA spending logic ?
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2024, 07:42:03 am »
Why not use a totally-not-a-rover rover shaped test mass? It's better if the thing is unfinished, because it will not be a functional rover, at least not by the specifications, but might still be usefull.
 

Offline Psi

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10114
  • Country: nz
Re: hmmm NASA spending logic ?
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2024, 08:18:25 am »
Sometimes NASA will cancel something for budget reasons that they know will cause an outcry, or threaten to cancel it.
Even when they have other options to save the money required to not cancel that thing.

They know if they cancel something important the outcry will likely trigger a boost in funding just to save that thing.
It's all politics and methods to get as much funding as they can.

It can of course backfire though.

In this case though, it looks like it was all contract based, it went too far over budget and triggered a cancellation.
« Last Edit: July 22, 2024, 08:27:40 am by Psi »
Greek letter 'Psi' (not Pounds per Square Inch)
 
The following users thanked this post: MK14


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf