Seems strange that they wouldn't have done some small scale tests BEFORE they bought 300 acres and built a full-scale tower. Wouldn't it have made more sense to do some experiments in somebody's garage
The Corums have been working on this for decades, with garage-experiment papers as early as the mid 80s, but finally performed longer-range testing in 2016 at Seneca Lake (I thought you read their paper?) Then, they published about their 2017 testing at 1.82MHz using a 1/30th-lambda tower, with progressive tests across distances 1, 2.5, 5, 8, 10, and 20 miles (short wood tower shown in their pdf physics paper, and their results plotted, perhaps you read a different paper?)
2016
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7577497conference paper, w/photos
http://vizivtechnologies.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/TEXZON_Baylor_Corum16.pdf and have successive tests of progressive lengths? As it is now, they supposedly have 30 receivers set up around the globe to assess signal strength/losses for the current FCC licensed test. It's going to be pretty funny if they come back and say, "Sorry....there are losses we didn't account for. It won't work".
It worked at Seneca Lake, then worked on land as predicted up to twenty miles, using HF band. Note that their experimental results give a graph which lays almost perfectly atop the theory graph. But any really interesting results will come from the future VLF testing, where the propagation-path is many orders less lossy.
For example, for known, conventional-RF behavior down at 100KHz the signal is still significant after passing once around the Earth (attenuated by something like ?5dB?) And down below 20KHz, the signal after a single pass around the Earth is known to come back at 95%, giving a cavity-Q of ~10. And, this low loss is even the conventional accepted value ...which Tesla-believers insist is a mistake caused by instrument artifacts. Supposedly N. Tesla found cavity-Q factors up in the hundreds/thousands. (Heh, maybe Tesla had accidentally discovered some sort of
unusual propagation mode, rather than employing Schumann ionospheric ducting.)
One nagging question that I keep asking is about the people involved in Viziv.....at the top are two retired Air Force generals. I have to wonder why they just happened to wind up at an "energy" company. Is there some "death ray" aspect to this, as a potential weapons system (or missile/AA defense)?
Good question.
I suspect that Air Force people might approach Corum if they had access to (or at least heard about) the 1940s weapons work spawned by the Nikola Tesla papers. In one of the old Tesla biographies the author found that one AFB had a complete set of the Tesla docs in their classified library, and that they'd built and tested Tesla's infamous metal-particles "death ray." (Didn't say whether they got it working!) If the same papers contained all the info about building these transmitters, then Texzon may be an unofficial "tech transfer" effort, to get some old disused military tech out into public use. In the case of Dr. Corum, there would be no need to expose classified docs, since Corum had already analyzed Tesla's devices back in the late 1980s, from first principles using Maxwell eqns. No need for illegal military leaks.
Why partner with Baylor University?
Because Corum is basically the world's foremost Tesla expert in academia. (I mean in phys/eng, not counting historians with no tech training.) And Corum is currently at Baylor.
There are a lot more questions than answers, about the technology, and Viziv's ultimate objective. Hopefully, they have some grand plan that will all come together. Otherwise, we can expect them all to be carted off to the loony bin.
Probably their plan is the same as it has been for forty years: Look at Tesla's broadcast-power claims using actual physics, find that they're real after all, so get a bit of funding and mount some kilometer-scale experiments to vindicate Tesla empirical numbers. Then if it still works in practice as the physics shows in theory, patent and make moolah.
The real question is, why didn't anyone do this a hundred years ago? Simple: to do that, physicists would have had to take Tesla seriously, and take a level-headed look into the math behind the devices.
Without sneering first. Even today, most would rather die. (Just look at the kinds of responses here. Any contact with N. Tesla will ruin your reputation as a scientist.) The very first one to actually do this was James Corum in 1986. Note that he's an engineering prof, not a physicist. And then, he couldn't get his papers into any journal. (They're in conference proceedings, which as everyone knows, don't count!
)