I don't know if it's free energy.
Free energy doesn't exist. I can proof it, mathematically!
Yet, I would like to discuss a few things. I would like to get to a neutral point of perspective, where we start to investigate stuff from a neutral point.
Can we? Do we want? Yes, this is the question.
What if I asked you: Is there free energy? You would say no, and I probably agreed. But then, what does that mean? Would you want free energy to exist? Would you like to have it?
Now I just asked, does it exist, and you said: "No". Doesn't this mean you don't want to have it? Because if you proofed it inexistent, you basically proofed you can never ever have it.
Now, I'm sorry for this philosophical debate, this is an electronics forum, and we're getting electric. Please trust me.
I want to have it. I want to have free energy. So where the f!(ck is it? I don't know, I can't explain. But if I asked you to discover electricity, you wouldn't really able to proof where it's coming from, you can show it, but how things work .... ehhh ... meh....
So ... Electricity, Electrics as I like to call it, electrics likes water, as I like to joke about it. From now on I'm rather explaining a story, an idea:
Electricts is when you think there is water, and buckets. It's when you start to connect things together.
So we start with a generator, a water source, 20 water per second. I hope units don't matter, they only need to be reasonable, right? Now with these 20 water a second, we're filling a bucket. This bucket can have in total 500 of water. This takes a while to fill. We don't care, we attach another of these buckets, and another one, one more, yes, one more, yes, yes, keep going. So now we've got a few.
Now in general electricity/electronicts, I believe it is such that when you have a transformer, driven at a certrain frequency, and you attach an output load, the "input" frequency lowers as the output let's call it load rises?
Now, I believe, if we have a bucket system like that, where we feed 20 water in with multiple "buffers" of 500 water, we can eventually fill it. And once it is filled, we can constantly take 20 water out of the system.
So far, so good. I hope we can agree, that this is balanced. (If ever any resistances come into play, I can tell you that we're able to scale them away! But pretty please, don't distract until we concluded). All in all, do resistances play a role? I feed 20 water into a system, I take 20 water out? where is resistance? Is there resistance? Did I even mange to generate heat? Then I'd generated additional energy. I don't care. Aaaah.
Sorry, I'm at a point where I see too much, I just get distracted. So, Sorry! *I bough down*
We have a system, where we feed 20 water in, we could take 20 water out, yet it can handle 500*10 water, in 10 stages, all connected by a limited flow. If we take water out at the end, more than is fed into the system, there will be a shortage in the first container, which then goes on to the next, to the next, and the next, until it reaches the source. And we drain the entire system...
But it's a bit more than that...
I need a break, it's really exhausting to explain everything. To me it makes sense, I believed, the simple things I said make sense. I proofed, that we can only have free energy once we belief in it.
Yet ... It's so fucking exhausting...
You know, once you come to understand that free energy doesn't exist, and you start to look for it, all you're going to find is proof. This is actually driving yourself absolutely mad. But it is still what I said: "Once you start looking for free energy all you will find is proof". And ultimately, once you found it, everything will be pain.
It will be you telling me:
* Jesus ... christ ... by zeus, the god of electricity, what you say is absolute bollocks, there is no free energy
* Maswells equations show there's nothing for free
* Zeus told us there is nothing for free
* The three laws of thermodynamics tell us there's nothing for free
I know. You see. From my perspective, there's the following question you could ask to a scholar:
Give me 50 reasons that free energy doesn't exist.
And then, the scholar comes up with a list.
But a the same time, you can ask: Give me 50 reasons why free energy can exist
And then, you will also get answers.
I mean. I think I've got some great ideas. But are you even interested? I mean, what is more important? Listening to me, or proofing me wrong, by showing that free energy does not exist?