bonyz: nice troll! 
What do you mean troll. I'm not trolling and just sharing to make you understand better because building a scanner to image "energy field" is even better and as Silicon Wizard. You may be able to do it. In the following is how a clairvoyant Barbara Ann Brennan, a NASA scientist who wrote the book "Hands of Lights" described how the clairvoyant seeing works (see attached images if the following doesn't load up):
Look, I have a very open mind, more than probably 90%-99% of the people here, I believe in some very "oogie-boogie" stuff (and NO, I don't care what anyone here thinks). But what I DON'T do is go galavanting personal beliefs as hard science on a technical forum, and even I think this is some wacky far fetched bullshit. When you come up with a bunch of nonsense explanations for unexplained stuff it just makes it worse, you muddy the line between what just needs research to figure out and what's "fringe science". You claim to come here looking to build an instrument, then start waffling on about third eyes an aliens which has NOTHING to do with your original question/research. So now, even if you wanted to research whatever it was as a science you've now lumped it squarely into the "woo-woo" bin and now no real scientists will ever touch it even if it is something that can be studied as a science.
Do you just throw random junk at the wall and see what will stick?
Like every time someone question what are you on about, you bring up something else? Dipole, Medians, Dark Matter...
Are you just going with the turboencabulator method of jargon spamming in hopes of us taking this seriously?
Normally I wouldn't care, but some stuff gets unfairely lumped into the "woo-woo" bin, and while I personally don't think this is one of them, this kind of crap of going full "turboencabulor" on stuff is what does it. An example of something I personally think is unfairely "fringe science" and falls squarely in the known laws of physics is "earthquake lights" (did a college group paper on those) and the "Brown Mountain lights". I don't think there's anything mystical or "oogie-boogie" about it, just electrical discharges. But people like YOU keep on going "ooo aliens!" and whatnot which makes everyone else go "eh, it's probably just car headlights" (like the Paulding light is) without verifying it scientifically either. And what's funny is Norway has the Hessdalen lights, which I think are the same thing, and they have a whole research station set up! We have people throwing dynamite at rocks hoping to make them spark.

(which is not what any of the papers on this stuff recommend doing, you need magnetohydrodynamic generators stationed at intervals then measure the feedback from the pulses to determine whether the ground has piezoelectric properties, and yet I see no equiment trucks out there) I'd rather people properly invest in learning about the natural world instead of verifying yet again that solar panels should not be flat and have stuff driven or sat on them.
I don't care what you believe, I have some wacky beliefs too, but which is it OP? Did you come here for science or just to tout your personal "woo-woo" beliefs on a technical forum where they have no place?! (something tells me that it can be scientifically proven to be the latter).
EDIT: No, I'm not a flerfer or conspiracy nut, I just like "oogie-boogie" stuff.