Author Topic: 0.4mm bga manufacturing ipc requirement  (Read 1537 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rookieTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 33
  • Country: us
0.4mm bga manufacturing ipc requirement
« on: November 01, 2019, 05:55:10 pm »
Working on a design that uses 0.4mm bga. The design needs to adhere to class3 guidelines, but the fab house came back saying there's going to be breakout on the annular ring on the inner layer and they cannot drill smaller mechanical holes[already at 6mil], eventually asking to drop class3 requirement for that part. So my questions are:

a) should i assume/accept a fallout in boards due to breakouts - how concerned should i be?

b) If this part[0.4mm pitch] can even be designed to a class3 requirement,

c) if yes then what techniques are used?
 

Offline Pseudobyte

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 294
  • Country: us
  • Embedded Systems Engineer / PCB Designer
Re: 0.4mm bga manufacturing ipc requirement
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2019, 06:20:20 pm »
LASER drills :)

Via in pad plugged and plated over.
“They Don’t Think It Be Like It Is, But It Do”
 
The following users thanked this post: rookie

Offline rookieTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 33
  • Country: us
Re: 0.4mm bga manufacturing ipc requirement
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2019, 08:16:09 pm »
So laser drills because they can go lower than 6mil? The annular ring requirement is pretty strict, and the pad size cannot increase because there is no space left, so the minimum ring distance still could not be met right? I guess the tolerance on the drill head should be pretty low.
 

Offline Pseudobyte

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 294
  • Country: us
  • Embedded Systems Engineer / PCB Designer
Re: 0.4mm bga manufacturing ipc requirement
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2019, 05:30:12 pm »
So laser drills because they can go lower than 6mil? The annular ring requirement is pretty strict, and the pad size cannot increase because there is no space left, so the minimum ring distance still could not be met right? I guess the tolerance on the drill head should be pretty low.

With a laser you can go smaller than 6mil. 4mil is pretty common. As long as you meet the aspect ratio requirements you should be fine. That means you may only be able to laser drill from layer 1-2. Once you are a layer below the BGA you gain space because there are no pads. You can make a small trace over to another via that goes to some other layer.

Drill pairs example 8 layer board:

1-8 through

1-2 blind
1-3 blind
2-3 buried
3-6 buried
6-7 buried
6-8 blind
7-8 blind

1_______________________
2___| |_| |________| |_____
3______| |_| |_____| |_____
4___________| |___| |_____
5___________| |___| |_____
6___________| |___| |_____
7______| |_| |_____| |_____
8___| |_| |________| |_____

You should place your via directly in the pad of the BGA. You might need to use a few layers/drill pairs to fanout the BGA properly.
“They Don’t Think It Be Like It Is, But It Do”
 
The following users thanked this post: rookie


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf