Author Topic: How to obtain waveform data for 1.2/50 us lightning pulse simulation?  (Read 1423 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hanakpTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 116
  • Country: cz
Hi all, I'm working on a measurement system that needs to survive standard 1.2/50 us lightning pulse with 9600 V peak voltage. It has somewhat complicated RC network at the input and I want to simulate peak voltages on all components in PSpice. But the problem is obtaining waveform data (time vs. voltage table) of the pulse. Its images are all over the Internet, but not the data. Is it in the EN 61010-1 standard somewhere (I don't have a copy)? Or do I really need to painstakingly recreate the data from the graph? Thanks.
 

Online MitjaN

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 35
  • Country: si
If you're left recreating data from image, this might help you: https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer/
 
The following users thanked this post: hanakp

Offline T3sl4co1l

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 22436
  • Country: us
  • Expert, Analog Electronics, PCB Layout, EMC
    • Seven Transistor Labs
Approximately this: https://www.seventransistorlabs.com/Images/8-20_Surge_Network.png
(Closer to IEC 61000-4-5, don't know if 61010 uses the same or not.)

Set initial conditions, don't even need a PWL source or whatever.

Note that it's the same network for 8/20 and 1.5/50, just depends on open/short condition.  It'll tend to be 1.5/50 for common mode with high resistance, and 8/20 when terminated or shunted by MOVs say.  It's shown with a shorted load.

Tim
« Last Edit: July 09, 2020, 08:46:42 pm by T3sl4co1l »
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Electronic design, from concept to prototype.
Bringing a project to life?  Send me a message!
 
The following users thanked this post: hanakp

Offline hanakpTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 116
  • Country: cz
Thanks T3sl4co1l, your circuit simulates it pretty well. I removed the RL resistor because the inputs on "my" system have high impedance (megaohms). I also tried a simpler 1.2/50 circuit from Addendum to Recommendation ITU-T K.44, but its edge time is about 20% shorter than the idealized waveform:

https://pes-spdc.org/content/new-waveshape-definitions-1250-820-and-10700?page=1

Well, the standards allow for +-30% time tolerances anyway, so it doesn't matter much in practice.
 
The following users thanked this post: T3sl4co1l


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf