Author Topic: Should a new EPM3064A be 'blank'?  (Read 1348 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline IllusionistTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 109
  • Country: gb
  • Why is the rum gone?
Should a new EPM3064A be 'blank'?
« on: August 20, 2019, 03:42:30 pm »
I got some 'new/old stock' EPM3064A CPLDs from China... possibly dodgy, I know, but at £1 each it was worth a punt for a hobbyist. They came in a cut off piece of a large antistatic tray and look new.

The Quartus II programmer identifies them OK, but they fail a blank check.  Should new/unused devices pass?

Since I've never bought a new CPLD from a real supplier, I don't know if they should pass or if there is some 'manufacturing configuration' on them or something.

The one I tested programmed and functioned OK, but I'm concerned about using one in a project in case it proves to have a fault due to being a pull. If they are pulls I'll put in a claim.

At least the jtag pins weren't reassigned like the load of used 7128s I once bought (thank The Great Prophet Zarquon for access to a master programmer!)
Agilent 34410A, GW Instek 8251A, Thurlby 1905A, Siglent DS1104X-E(unlocked), SDG1032X(unlocked), Micsig DP10013 MX, LeCroy PP008 500MHz Probes, Fluke 179
 

Offline Mr. Scram

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9810
  • Country: 00
  • Display aficionado
Re: Should a new EPM3064A be 'blank'?
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2019, 03:47:07 pm »
Always assume anything from unofficial sources are counterfeits or pulls. It'd be naive to think you can get this kind of kit through dodgy channels and get pristine new chips.
 

Offline IllusionistTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 109
  • Country: gb
  • Why is the rum gone?
Re: Should a new EPM3064A be 'blank'?
« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2019, 04:04:21 pm »
I know, but they could also be exactly what was advertised. Those chips have been around for long enough. If they are pulls, they've been cleaned up remarkably well because I can't tell.

My question remains...
Agilent 34410A, GW Instek 8251A, Thurlby 1905A, Siglent DS1104X-E(unlocked), SDG1032X(unlocked), Micsig DP10013 MX, LeCroy PP008 500MHz Probes, Fluke 179
 

Offline rstofer

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9935
  • Country: us
Re: Should a new EPM3064A be 'blank'?
« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2019, 07:40:58 pm »
For the hobbyist, what difference does it make?  Does it function?  Does it do what you want?  Then, it's fine.  Just don't try to market anything with floor sweepings from China.
 

Offline IllusionistTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 109
  • Country: gb
  • Why is the rum gone?
Re: Should a new EPM3064A be 'blank'?
« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2019, 11:39:16 pm »
It matters because as I said in my OP:

"I'm concerned about using one in a project in case it proves to have a fault due to being a pull."

Until it's soldered onto a board, I won't know if it functions properly. Then I'm left trying to repair a board if it doesn't.

Anyway, I pointed out the fact to the seller, who immediately issued a refund with no further comments. I guess that answered my question.

Agilent 34410A, GW Instek 8251A, Thurlby 1905A, Siglent DS1104X-E(unlocked), SDG1032X(unlocked), Micsig DP10013 MX, LeCroy PP008 500MHz Probes, Fluke 179
 

Offline ejeffrey

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3893
  • Country: us
Re: Should a new EPM3064A be 'blank'?
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2019, 04:11:13 pm »
Even if they are "new old stock" it is possible they are from a production overstock in which case they could easily have been factory programmed but never assembled.  There is no way to tell.

I honestly wouldn't let the existence of a pre-existing image sway me.  If I was willing to take a chance on a $1 part from a dodgy seller I would go ahead and try anyway.  If I were that concerned about soldering it onto a board and finding it non-functional I would be buying parts from an authorized distributor in the first place. 
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf