It's about deep pipelining. You issue one command, then another, yet another one, and some more, and after your 60ns or whatever the first result arrives, and then the others arrive at a faster rate than with older RAM technology of equal latency.
This benefits mainly sequential throughput. Random access, not so much.
Besides, your 60ns seems to refer to full row access (RAS)? Reading from the current row (CAS) tends to be no more than 10ns. Again, a difference mainly meaningful for sequential access.