orangepi, you have only yourself to blame for the reaction you have garnered here.
The original problem lies less in the responses - but more in how you phrased your question.
It would seem to me that your question relates to the losses of 220V power over 65 feet of a 24 AWG conductor. That is a fair question.
However, you muddied the waters completely by adding a particular type of cable which is completely unsuitable for such considerations. That is your mistake - and you should take responsibility for that.
But that's just the beginning. The fact that you are asking this simple question indicates you have a very limited understanding and that, coupled with the mentioning of a quite unsuitable cable, sets off the safety alarm bells of anybody and everybody who has the faintest inkling of the risk.
THEN you get on your high horse and, rather than apologise for your poorly phrased question, you continue to defend it, claiming it was all very clear from the beginning. You have completely ignored any concerns from the members here AND you have taken them to task for being obtuse.
Such an arrogance is not going to earn you any respect - and it is certainly going to put people off from even considering helping you. I mean, why should we stick our neck out when we can expect to be attacked if our interpretation of you questions are based on what you said - and not what you meant?
If you want help, apologise for your actions, ask the question clearly (and, NO, you haven't done that yet) and act with some level of courtesy in dealing with the responses.
As for me, I've spent enough of my time trying to help you by typing this up. I doubt it was time well spent - but I would like you to prove me wrong.