Maybe you also get the BenchVue Software for your DMM free, w/o timely limitations, as it's currently promoted here in Germany.
https://www.keysight.com/de/de/lib/resources/installation-guides/benchvue-licenses-included-with-instruments-3046463.html
Any idea why all the links that say "Basic instructions for how to redeem and activate this type of license" or "See instructions to check for eligibility and activation instructions." turn into "Page Not Found" (at least for a small list of EU countries I tried)? Is it over, or is that just a badly maintained website?
(Not that I personally would want to use it, as it is Windows only --requires me to launch a VM--, and I only have 1 Keysight instrument, so I don't see the use for me. TC or sigrok or python will do for me.)
About the low current measurements and digitizing, some feedback with my experiences and disillusions with this instrument. A "real" bench DMM brings a learning curve with it. Just hoping that the following might help others.
I bought the 34465A thinking it would be great for creating those fancy power-draw-over-time graphs, at high resolution. Yes, 50k samples/s is not much compared to the 1M samples/s of the DMM6500, but at least I would have "real" low current resolution.
Totally wrong. Totally naive. For 3 reasons:
1) autorange is disabled when digitizing, at least on a 34465A. You will need to pick a range, and accept the limitations of that range. Don't know about the DMM6500.
2) device bandwidth. DCI BW -3db = 10kHz (any range). Yes, the DMM6500 does significantly better on 100mA range: 340kHz, but drops to 25kHz on 1A. So when you measure a device that peaks to 200mA (easily the case when you do WiFi), the difference between the 2 instruments is not that big anymore. On both, more than 50k samples/sec is even useless. When you can stay below 100mA (or accept overloads), DMM6500 seems a lot better though.
3) resolution. The higher the sampling rate, the lower the effective resolution. When doing 10k samples/sec on the 1A range, the 34465A will give you 5 effective digits, so a 100uA resolution. Not great. The DMM6500 would give you 10uA. BUT, here is something that I cannot confirm, I only got it from the specs --"Typical Digitize Signal Characteristics"--, so I may misunderstand: the DMM6500 will not, and not even close, be able to deliver you that resolution. At that sample frequency, it will only give you 8 effective bits out of the 16. Your scope will likely do just as good or even better! You will gain 2 bits when going to the 100mA range though. Yay. Still not 5 digits though. The DMM6500 will even drop to 5
bits on the 10A range, over 10k samples/sec.
So it all depends on your needs, but you will need to read the fine print. A digitizing bench DMM is not a high resolution scope.