Author Topic: Rigol DS5152C Does any body have experience with it good or bad?  (Read 4951 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GvendurETopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: is
Dose  any body have or has worked with a Rigol DS5152C I cant fined any review online.
Would be grate full if anybody can tell me anything about it.

All the best
GvendurE
« Last Edit: January 07, 2011, 10:48:06 pm by GeoffS »
555 is king
 

Offline GvendurETopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: is
Re: Rigol DS5152C Dose any body have experience with it god or bad?
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2011, 07:49:51 pm »
Or at least tel me if it is worth buying for hobby/pro home lab?
555 is king
 

Offline saturation

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4787
  • Country: us
  • Doveryai, no proveryai
    • NIST
Re: Rigol DS5152C Dose any body have experience with it god or bad?
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2011, 10:12:24 pm »
Hi!

I don't own or have experience with this scope but just read of it; its a much older model; it has many of the features of the 1052E, with 2 major catches.

it only has 4k points memory length per channel; you get 16 kpts in the 1052E, and up to 1 Meg points per channel in single channel long record mode.

It samples at 200MSa/s real time, versus 1Gs/s to 500Ms/s on the 1052E.

Thus, this older model is more prone to aliasing errors with slower time bases.  Also, its really useful only to about 20 MHz [ using the rule Ms/s /10 = frequency response ] compared to the 1052E.  

Given that the 1052E 50 MHz scope costs $400,  this model is workable for a home lab if will cost you $100-200, tops, about half price for half the bandwidth.  I don't think its worth more because Rigol doesn't even give support data on its website.

« Last Edit: January 07, 2011, 10:19:18 pm by saturation »
Best Wishes,

 Saturation
 

Offline GvendurETopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: is
Re: Rigol DS5152C Does any body have experience with it good or bad?
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2011, 03:34:21 pm »
Hi!

I don't own or have experience with this scope but just read of it; its a much older model; it has many of the features of the 1052E, with 2 major catches.

it only has 4k points memory length per channel; you get 16 kpts in the 1052E, and up to 1 Meg points per channel in single channel long record mode.

It samples at 200MSa/s real time, versus 1Gs/s to 500Ms/s on the 1052E.

Thus, this older model is more prone to aliasing errors with slower time bases.  Also, its really useful only to about 20 MHz [ using the rule Ms/s /10 = frequency response ] compared to the 1052E. 


Thanks That was werry helpful.
555 is king
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf