Hi innkeeper,
thanks for your observations. As I stated many posts above, I just want to have some safety margin to stay on the safe side. A reduction around 20% of torque when the stepper is holding a load (no movements) is not a bad idea, after all. If I can do it by program is even more clever.
More than this, I had another idea while writing in this thread: this feature could be used to make the manual rotation of the throttle (yes, we're talking about a motorcycle) more effortless. The stepper could help the hand of driver once the direction of the movement is detect.
I have received a little board with an AS5600 magnetic sensor rated for 0.015 degree of resolution (in ideal conditions). So I think that I could detect when the "user" starts manually applying some force on the motor shaft, and help him with some light torque in the same direction. It would be clever
if this idea works, isn't it?
Anyway, having (even a limited) control on the current trasmitted to the motor is a "nice-to-have" feature that all driver should offer, IMO. Setting the current by manually rotating a pot seems a little as a travel back to the '80 era...
The enclosing boxYes, I have to avoid a plastic in favour of a 100% metal solution. With some thermal paste in between, a
metal box could work as heat sink as well.
I have also thought to mount the stepper at open-air, but the look will be honestly quite ugly...
The electronics will be stored in a separate box 90cm (3 feet) away from the stepper. I plane to use a generous size of the cables to minimize resistance. I think that some AWG20 wires should be enough.