That's innovation. It's not as glorious as other types of innovation, but it's still progress. I'm actually on the third revision of the delta mechanism, and the fourth revision of the component feeders (still need one more rev after the first full system tests). If we find something that works, then others can copy us (abiding by the CC-BY-SA, hopefully). If we fail, we'll be an example of what not to do.
Sure, and that's why I fully support what you are doing.
If you think the delta system might be workable then it's certainly worth a shot, and of course everyone learns from it which is great.
The delta design is REALLY hard to screw up, we're doing lots of camera calibration before, and even during the job, to account for any misalignment that could happen.
I don't doubt that, but is it a good enough platform to use for $5K-$10K PnP machine, and the level of precision people would expect in that price range?
That's the big question here, I guess we'll find out.
If our delta mechanism is a dead end, we'll try CoreXY or something like that, we won't either (A) just give up or (B) try to make it work even though it's flawed.
Excellent!
Again, I think what you are doing is awesome, you seem to have the commitment to drive this beyond what most people/teams have done, I hope it works well.