I had both and I think DS1054Z is much better and much less problematic.
From the beginning to this day, firmware in a DHO800/900 is a piece of sh*t, written by some interns. Only one positive side is hackable (even up to the 1 GHz) bandwidth.
That seems like a rather distorted take on the DHO800. I had the DS1054Z for many years, and the DHO1074 (largely the same firmware as the 800) for a couple of months. While I eventually decided for the competing SDS814X HD from Siglent, I would certainly say that the DHO800 is better than the DS1000Z in many respects -- and I am not aware of a single aspect where it is worse:
12 bits; higher bandwidth option available; more memory; decoding from full memory; higher screen resolution; touch screen; dual flex encoders for parameter setting; HDMI output. I wish they would optimize the UI's use of screen real estate a bit more (like in mrisco's modified version), but again, I am not aware of a situation where the old DS1054Z displays more/better information on its lower-resolution screen.
So in which respects do you find the DS1054Z "better and less problematic"?