My pulse generator from Leo Bodnar arrived yesterday, so I would like to contribute with my slow-but-I-am-loving-it EDUX1052A. (...)
I wonder where that aberration came from; it is much greater than I would expect considering the much faster settling time of the pulse generator compared to a 60 MHz oscilloscope. My guess is that the oscilloscope does *not* have a Gaussian or single pole response.
Yes, I did not expect to see this kind of overshoot on a scope with 50MHz bandwidth. For reference, this is the same pulser on the EXR104 I am using at work. This time without inline terminator in native 50R mode.