A company's reputation can be damaged by malicious insults. This is Norwegian law:
§ 247. Any person who by word or deed behaves in a manner that is likely to harm
another person’s good name and reputation or to expose him to hatred, contempt,
or loss of the confidence necessary for his position or business, or who is accessory
thereto, shall be liable to fines or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year. If
the defamation is committed in print or in broadcasting or otherwise under especially
aggravating circumstances, imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years may be
imposed.
Tough. Regarding that one, it has to be a "malicious" insult. Broadcasting experiences with poor design aren't malicious - that's simply another form of customer feedback.
If there is a design flaw that results in the customer paying egregiously for repair, even if it's some reasonable time out of the warranty period, then the company sure as better understand that in this day and age people will have the ability and capability to broadcast their experience using rather effective methods.
Something as sophisticated as that scope can easily have any number of software issues. They are actually expected, which is why the software can be upgraded in the field. Perhaps a combination of hardware design issues and software problems resulted in the trouble. That should not be a warranty / out of warranty issue. It's a design error that terminated proper operation of the equipment. It's no different than having a built-in self-destruct that destroys the equipment after some period of time, only in this case the action appears to be the result of an obscure problem.
Problem reports like this get recorded until eventually there is a pattern clear enough to be recognized, and resources are allocated to fix the problem.