I'm only guessing here ... but I suspect you might have a more constructive interaction with the lawyers than others may have experienced, due to your ability to not only see the wood from the trees, but to be able to differentiate the bark, branches and leaves.
If they have a point, I would expect you will not only be able to see it, but understand it well enough to discuss the implications intelligently and possibly work out a resolution that is satisfactory to both parties. I have the feeling others in a similar boat would be squealing like a stuck pig, rendering them incapable or at least disadvantaged in being able to engage in objective discussion.
I just watched your video on the $25 iPhone 6 screen repair - and I am heartened by your comments about the difficulties faced by women in tech. Spot on - but there's one point I would like to extend...
While it shouldn't be, sadly, the discrimination is real and perpetuated through another subtle process. If a man had written that article, he would have been personally labelled an idiot or stooge. The gender based reflection upon other male journalists would have been nil. However, since it was a female, the discriminatory attitude shows through in there being a significant portion of the 'idiot' reaction not reflecting on the single person, but to women - and not just journalists.
In my experience of the best part of 3 decades in the IT industry, I have not seen any gender based differences between the capabilities of men and women - but a lot of differentiation which derives from aptitude and confidence (both male and female). In some environments, however, opportunities do seem to have had a bias towards men.
I have worked with both capable and pathetic people - and there has been no correlation to gender.