I had a little experiment recently. I ordered two sets of identical boards from JLCPCB specifically to have a play with some tiny QFN parts. One set with ENIG, one set with standard leaded HASL. The packages were QFN16 logic gates (74HC595) in 2.5 x 3.5 mm packages. Used a stencil, hot air and three different 63/37 solder pastes, one with some very old paste with a little silver in, one with fresh chipquik straight 63/37 and one fresh mechanic 63/37 - all on ENIG. All went well first time. Of all the solder pastes the cheapo mechanic produced the best finish. I also tried mechanic on the HASL version of the board. Again, no problems, worked well first time.
The thing that sticks out as significantly different is that you're using an odd-ball low temperature paste. From what I've heard the thing that will get you every time with QFN is "
too much paste" especially on centre pads. It has never given me problems, but I've heeded others advice to use fairly aggressive paste aperture reduction for body pads and a moderate shrink on the perimeter pads.
Full details of my experiment copied from a previous post -
As a reminder, this is the stupidly small package that I'm working with:
I have stock of three different solder pastes that I've tried out on the same part and board. The first is some old Sn63Pb36Ag2 with type 818 flux that I've had sitting in the fridge for a couple of years; I've lost its pedigree but it's a respectable brand that someone was selling on ebay in economical size syringes that they'd filled themselves with something that normally only comes in giant pots (Multicore, Kesler, something of that ilk). The second is a syringe of fresh Mechanic brand XGZ40 (a common cheap Chinese variety sourced via ebay). The last is a virgin syringe of Chipquik SMD291AX bought from RS. The latter two are straight 63/37 alloys. All are type 3 mesh.
The results:
Old Sn63Pb36Ag2 | Mechanic | Chipquik |
| | |
Worked fine, a tad drossy, best tack | OK, less tacky than the first | Least tacky |
All those results are on boards with an ENiG finish. They all self-aligned equally well, any apparent differences are down to camera angle.
So, my conclusion? The best feel, the easiest to use was the old solder but the results are a bit drossy - it's too old. The Mechanic and Chipquik produced comparable results but the Mechanic was a little bit easier to print and slightly tackier. The mechanic is also about £5 a syringe and the Chipquik £15. So I'm going to stick with the Mechanic for the time being and keep my eyes open for some quality high tack paste with some silver content at a reasonable price. All were good enough to get the job done.
For the sake of experiment I also ordered some HASL(leaded) finish boards at the same time. All the advice I've ever received as "
Use ENiG for QFN packages" so I wasn't too hopeful for the results. I was wrong, the HASL boards were as easy to place these tiny QFN packages on and get finished results as good as the ENiG boards. No pics because they're not really helpful, you can't distinguish the results from the ENiG board done with the same paste. Now, this is a one-off, but the takeaway is that fine pitch
will work on HASL - your mileage may vary. Why this matters is that the ENiG finish option alone costs significantly more than the boards most of the time from people the likes of JLCPCB (£12.25 extra for ENiG on a £1.44 100x100mm board).
The complete 25 x 50mm test board.
This one was soldered with the old slightly tired paste that was
technically well out of date.